Subnetting problem

myke2424myke2424 Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
I'm not sure if this a typo from my professor but when I calculate the problem below I get the following:

Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.128
Subnet Address: 128.1.2.0
First Usable: 128.1.2.1
Last Usable 128.1.2.126
Broadcast: 128.1.2.127

I don't get why his Subnet address is 128.1.1.0 and what does it mean by calculate for the "2nd" subnet. I don't know what to look for when it asking for a x number subnet. Thank you


This is from my professor, is this correct?

Comments

  • no!all!no!all! Member Posts: 245 ■■■□□□□□□□
    Using a 255.255.255.128 mask only gives you two subnets: 128.1.2.0 and 128.1.2.128, the 2nd subnet would be 128.1.2.128, hope this helps.
    A+, N+, S+, CCNA:RS, CCNA:Sec

    "In high society TCP is more welcome than UDP. At least it knows a proper handshake" - Ben Franklin

    2019 Goals: CCNP:RS & relocate to St. Pete, FL!
  • myke2424myke2424 Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    Thank a lot, but how come on the second subnet you wrote the 3rd octet changes from a 2 to 1? I thought you don't change that because the 3rd octet in the subnet mask is 255.
  • NetworkNewbNetworkNewb Member Posts: 3,298 ■■■■■■■■■□
    In the attached picture if you put 2s instead of 1s in the 3rd octet of those answers, they will all be correct...

    Just a typo by him I'm guessing
  • NetworkNewbNetworkNewb Member Posts: 3,298 ■■■■■■■■■□
    no!all! wrote: »
    Using a 255.255.255.128 mask only gives you two subnets: 128.1.2.0 and 128.1.1.128, the 2nd subnet would be 128.1.2.128, hope this helps.

    if you use that subnet on a class B network it will work. I blame the professor for not being clear on that though.
  • myke2424myke2424 Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    So both answers would be considered correct?
  • NetworkNewbNetworkNewb Member Posts: 3,298 ■■■■■■■■■□
    No it is a 128, it should be a Class B. Didn't really think about it... so your answers look good.
  • myke2424myke2424 Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    Apparently his is correct according to him how is that even possible.
  • NetworkNewbNetworkNewb Member Posts: 3,298 ■■■■■■■■■□
    myke2424 wrote: »
    Apparently his is correct according to him how is that even possible.

    He is just stubborn I guess ;) Just plug ip address and subnet mask into here Online IP Subnet Calculator
  • DLSK12DLSK12 Member Posts: 5 ■□□□□□□□□□
    You are correct.
  • DeathmageDeathmage Banned Posts: 2,496
    Use Binary, it helps explain it. - here i'll show you. :)

    Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.128
    Subnet Address: 128.1.2.0
    First Usable: 128.1.2.1
    Last Usable 128.1.2.126
    Broadcast: 128.1.2.127


    1st off you need to know this:

    Class A: 1 - 126
    Class B: 128 - 191
    Class C: 192 - 224
    (127 is reserved for loopback)


    Look at this picture, I'll do a problem from my workbook that I'm using for subnetting currently.



    I'm doing this one for 172.100.5.0 with a mask like yours of 255.255.255.128

    So since we know the 4th octet is the interesting one, we focus there. And now by looking at the subnets (which go by 2's from left to right) and the hosts (wihch go by 2's from right to left) you can see with your interesting number of 128 in the picture above you basically just draw a imaginary line between the Binary value of 128 and 64. So this leave you with 128 addresses per subnet with 512 subnets.

    So....

    This means you have 128 addresses per subnet range but there is a catch you need one for the network ID and one for the Broadcast ID, so anytime you have a host range always minus two. So in this case your Network ID would be 172.100.5.0 and your broadcast ID would be 172.100.5.127 and your usable IP range would be what in-between so that's 172.100.5.1 to 172.100.5.126.

    Now since you know there is 256 bits in one octet you can minus 128 from 256 and still have 128 left over so you can have two ranges of 128 addresses.

    The 2nd range would be a Network ID of 172.100.5.128 and a range of 172.100.5.129 to 172.100.5.255 and a Broadcast ID of 172.100.5.256.

    Anytime you need to understanding subnetting just use binary and use the graph above as a reference. It's helped me understand subnetting. See I've start at the root with binary, some people use the power of 2's but that should only be done as a shortcut after you understand binary fully.

    One thing I recommend is practise a little bit each day, subnetting is one of those things until you master it that if you don't use it you forget it. 5 to 10 minutes each days does wonders.

    Hope this helps!!!!
  • Jon_CiscoJon_Cisco Member Posts: 1,772 ■■■■■■■■□□
    The key to your problem is in condition f.
    This is probably an example from an old book that does not allow you to use subnet 0.

    So
    128.1.1.0 (in the past the 0 subnet was skipped)
    128.1.1.128 (first usable)
    128.1.2.0 (second usable)
    128.1.2.128 (third usable)
  • jvrlopezjvrlopez Member Posts: 913 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Tell your teacher he is wrong and you will now be teaching the class.
    And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high. ~Ayrton Senna
Sign In or Register to comment.