What would a future employee think of someone who worked full time in a computer security role and studied a masters degree in their own time, but didn't get distinction?
The reason I ask, is because i'm working full time and have took on a MSc degree. I have absolutely no doubt that i'd achieve a distinction if I was studying the MSc without working full time, but due to financial constraints, I cannot afford to leave my job to pursue the MSc. The MSc requires around 20 hours per week and I work 37 hours a week and have a 2 hour drive (10 hours weekly) so i'm currently doing a 67 hour week..

Is it still good having a masters if it's not a distinction? I just know i'll feel a bit crappy that i've not achieved the best I can do.
Will an employer still appreciate the sheer time i've put into this?