Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
mikwelque wrote: » I..?
Phileeeeeeep651 wrote: » Are those commute times round trip or one way? Really I think this boils down to what do you want long term? Like yellowpad said, do you see yourself moving towards a sys admin role or security?
mikwelque wrote: » ......maybe sys admin a little bit more.
mikwelque wrote: » ..... NOC its shiftwork including holidays and weekends, so thats not necessarily fun either.
mikwelque wrote: » ......only working M-F is nice.
Phileeeeeeep651 wrote: » Yeah, I completely understand. For me, M-F would be my choice, especially if I had a family. Shift work has its perks, but I find myself always trying to catch up on sleep on my off days and constantly switching between days and nights isn't great for your health. I also feel like the gov job would be more accepting of your AF reserves commitment, AT, Drill Weekends, etc.
bpenn wrote: » Ah, a fellow AF Reservist! What is your AFSC? I am a 3D1X1.
NetworkNewb wrote: » That drive to the NOC job would be a deal breaker for me, wouldn't even talk to a company that far away. 3 hours a day driving! nope, not happening If you REALLY wanted to get into Networking you could probably suck it up, do the drive, and get the experience though.
Blackout wrote: » Im actually a fan of the NOC, you get exposure to tons of different Tech. Plus you get plenty of study time, depending on the shift.
beatfreaker wrote: » It's really hard to guage on what the actual work is based on titles alone. I've seen some NOCs that barely have access and I've seen some that have almost full control. But generally this is how I see it. NOC = if you like puzzles, analyzing things, doing reports, reading reports, managing events, managing people/resources/vendors (break/fix bridge can get real nasty when its multi vendor).
TWX wrote: » The way you originally described it, the govt contract did not sound like jr. sysadmin so much as helpdesk tier 2/3. Depending on the tools to do the job there might not be as much meaningful tech exposure in such a scenario anyway.
mikwelque wrote: » I mentioned it in my post above but it was probably overlooked. I went with the NOC position mostly because being with a big private company with full benefits was too much to pass up vs gov. contracting. Also the commute was so bad with the sys admin job I think the money would have been about even after factoring in gas. I think I'll be able to grow with this job as its a big company and from what I can tell this NOC position is pretty in depth. Thanks for the help everybody
yellowpad wrote: » Congrats!!!! I overlooked....Keep us up to date whether you like it or not. Would you be able to share with us factors that got you those offers?
mikwelque wrote: » Yeah I started to feel that way too. I even asked them at the interview why the position was titled Account Management Technician but was presented as a jr sys admin job and they just kept saying thats what their company decided to technically call the position. It felt like more a function of the help desk than I wanted it to but possibly still decent sys admin exposure. I've learned these contracting companies will say anything to seal a deal.
TWX wrote: » Almost forgot about that, it's not what the job is informally called that goes on your resume, it's what your title is. "Account Management Technician" could be as low as the schmuck that deals with locked-out user accounts when the afflicted user calls-in, or as high as the person that logs into the LDAP or AD or TACACS server and maintains account privileges and creates accounts, but normally there are better titles for the latter.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.