Options

ISACA CSX Practitioner Exam Experience

2»

Comments

  • Options
    RemedympRemedymp Member Posts: 834 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Does the CSX-Practitioner require you to have the CSX-Foundation cert? Does the CSX-Specialist require you to have the Practitioner cert?
    I'm trying to coordinate my cert ascent to CSX-Expert (when it becomes available) and don't wish to waste time/money on the beginner exams if not required. There is much crossover, but my goal is to obtain the most advanced cert from each of the major organizations (GIAC, ISACA, Offensive Security, ISC2, and EC-Council). Between them, whomever is hiring will surely find a cert they can respect (One presumes I will also have the skillz to back up the cert)

    You must pass CSX-P before proceeding to the next CSX cert.
  • Options
    yoba222yoba222 Member Posts: 1,237 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Just stumbled upon the existence of this cert. Very interesting. So it looks like:
    1. You don't need to take the fundamentals (CSXF) to take the practitioner (CSXP) exam.
    2. ISACA requires you get CPEs (I bet there's a fee icon_rolleyes.gif) AND retake the exam after around 3 years to recertify.
    3. You can take the next harder exam, the specialist (CSXS) to recertify.
    4. The CSXS exam barely even exists yet, if even at all.
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/isaca-csx-specialist-pilot-offering-t-frank-downs
    5. The expert exam (CSXE) seems to not exist yet. I'm having a hard time finding either the CSXS or the CSXE on their website.

    One of the things I like about eLearnSecurity is that it provides a fantastic learning journey, however, the industry recognition is basically nonexistent.

    This looks like it provides a similar learning journey. As far as industry recognition, it's not there yet, but it's ISACA. Don't need to say anything more there.


    EDIT: Aha. ISACA has the CSXS and CSXE URLs unlisted but up:
    https://cybersecurity.isaca.org/csx-certifications/csx-specialist-certification
    https://cybersecurity.isaca.org/csx-certifications/csx-expert-certification
    A+, Network+, CCNA, LFCS,
    Security+, eJPT, CySA+, PenTest+,
    Cisco CyberOps, GCIH, VHL,
    In progress: OSCP
  • Options
    RemedympRemedymp Member Posts: 834 ■■■■□□□□□□
    yoba222 wrote: »
    Just stumbled upon the existence of this cert. Very interesting. So it looks like:
    1. You don't need to take the fundamentals (CSXF) to take the practitioner (CSXP) exam.
    2. ISACA requires you get CPEs (I bet there's a fee icon_rolleyes.gif) AND retake the exam after around 3 years to recertify.
    3. You can take the next harder exam, the specialist (CSXS) to recertify.
    4. The CSXS exam barely even exists yet, if even at all.
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/isaca-csx-specialist-pilot-offering-t-frank-downs
    5. The expert exam (CSXE) seems to not exist yet. I'm having a hard time finding either the CSXS or the CSXE on their website.

    One of the things I like about eLearnSecurity is that it provides a fantastic learning journey, however, the industry recognition is basically nonexistent.

    This looks like it provides a similar learning journey. As far as industry recognition, it's not there yet, but it's ISACA. Don't need to say anything more there.


    EDIT: Aha. ISACA has the CSXS and CSXE URLs unlisted but up:
    https://cybersecurity.isaca.org/csx-certifications/csx-specialist-certification
    https://cybersecurity.isaca.org/csx-certifications/csx-expert-certification

    The recognition won't be there until they start giving it away for free. I think comptia does a pretty good job of pushing it's certs in early status to a select 50 to 100 guest test takers. Once those guest update their LI, it will start the recognition process.
  • Options
    cissp2015cissp2015 Member Posts: 6 ■□□□□□□□□□
    In the labs, there are also attack scenarios generated by the students (for example with metasploit, creating malicious file with msfvenom), do we need this knowledge for the exam as well or during the exam, the attacks will be performed by the system and our goal is only to identify, protect, detect, respond and recover? in other words, during the exam, do we need to switch between virtual machines to generate malicious traffic?

    Thank you.
  • Options
    cissp2015cissp2015 Member Posts: 6 ■□□□□□□□□□
    I would appreciate if someone may provide answers to my questions below.

    1- How many questions/scenarios do we get in the exam?
    2- The questions related to Nmap/pfSense/Snorby/Splunk, do we need to know more than what the labs are teaching us? For example, do we need to know each CLI parameter, menu options and settings of these tools inside out or limited to what is shown in the labs?
    3- In the labs, there are also attack scenarios generated by the students (for example with metasploit, creating malicious file with msfvenom), do we need this knowledge for the exam as well or during the exam, the attacks will be performed by the system and our goal is only to identify, protect, detect, respond and recover? in other words, during the exam, do we need to switch between virtual machines to generate malicious traffic?

    Thank you.
  • Options
    cissp2015cissp2015 Member Posts: 6 ■□□□□□□□□□
    In the exam, do we need to sniff the traffic with tcpdump or wireshark or we will be given the packets captured during the compromise to analyse?
  • Options
    BlucodexBlucodex Member Posts: 430 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Sitting in the CSX Fundamentals 2 day class right now. The Practitioner cert looks to be pretty good for IR.
  • Options
    EndorianEndorian Registered Users Posts: 1 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Hey guys, just thought I'd drop a note and bring some life back into this thread. CSX is growing and we are going to start running some additional pilots for our new content. If you are interested DM me with your information and get a chance to take part in defining new ISACA cybersecurity content. 😁
  • Options
    636-555-3226636-555-3226 Member Posts: 975 ■■■■■□□□□□
    I'm interested, but how about you DM me? I tried to send you a DM but got rejected (see below). I always like giving back to the infosec community!



    The following errors occurred with your submission
    • Endorian has chosen not to receive private messages or may not be allowed to receive private messages. Therefore you may not send your message to him/her.

      If you are trying to send this message to multiple recipients, remove Endorian from the recipient list and send the message again.
  • Options
    JramaniJramani Registered Users Posts: 1 ■□□□□□□□□□
    I bought 3 CSX labs. I have problem with the lab 2.14. How to decrypt the file in Kali Linux. Lab says ' using numerical value in the traffic , open attacker note in kali Linux.
  • Options
    random_handlerandom_handle Registered Users Posts: 1 ■□□□□□□□□□
    Jramani wrote: »
    I bought 3 CSX labs. I have problem with the lab 2.14. How to decrypt the file in Kali Linux. Lab says ' using numerical value in the traffic , open attacker note in kali Linux.

    Hello Jramani,

    I have also purchased the 3 CSX labs and exam. When you launch a lab, there are 3 tabs off to the right of the pop-out window; Content, Machines, and Support.

    Under the Support tab, there is a heading for Resources and below it is a Lab Manual link. If you open the Lab Manual for 2.14, it will give you some direction on how to find what you are seeking.

    Lastly, do not use the captures that are already present in your home directory.
  • Options
    RUTTYRUTTY Registered Users Posts: 2 ■□□□□□□□□□
    I also struggle with Lab 2.14, do you know how yet?
  • Options
    RUTTYRUTTY Registered Users Posts: 2 ■□□□□□□□□□
    I already knew answer of Lab 2.14, actually I found many times but I did not realize that the number is a part of that message without dash.
  • Options
    rob_orbrob_orb Registered Users Posts: 3 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Hi guys,

    I'm stuck on the second task of lab 2.14 - "detect the incident occurring on the network".
    I did everything according to lab 2.02 (Lab Manual) up to tcpdump, waited 10-15 minutes, opened .cap file, but I don't understand what should I look for.
  • Options
    TayyebTayyeb Registered Users Posts: 1 ■□□□□□□□□□
    Thanks thegoodbye for sharing your experience, i' following up this post threads as i'm so interested in CSXP.
    Could you please share some extra details like how much it costs you to get the CSXP considering the costs of exam,laps,materials & any thing else ?

    Thank you.
  • Options
    rob_orbrob_orb Registered Users Posts: 3 ■■□□□□□□□□
    edited August 2019
    Tayyeb wrote: »
    Thanks thegoodbye for sharing your experience, i' following up this post threads as i'm so interested in CSXP.
    Could you please share some extra details like how much it costs you to get the CSXP considering the costs of exam,laps,materials & any thing else ?
    Thank you.
    I've purchased the whole set this summer: 3 labs ($500 each, but $1400 alltogether) and exam ($500). The labs included the labs and the Compendium.pdf (200 pages), which summarize all material and even more.
    The only additional thing you need is your time )))
  • Options
    rob_orbrob_orb Registered Users Posts: 3 ■■□□□□□□□□
    rob_orb wrote: »
    Hi guys,
    I'm stuck on the second task of lab 2.14 - "detect the incident occurring on the network".
    I did everything according to lab 2.02 (Lab Manual) up to tcpdump, waited 10-15 minutes, opened .cap file, but I don't understand what should I look for.
    I'll answer to myself )))
    I did the same thing during the exam, but it was more obvious to find the information related to the incident.
  • Options
    scascscasc Member Posts: 462 ■■■■■■■□□□
    Is there much difference between CSX and GCIH? Looking to put some of my team through either, just need to see which one has more value and if they both teach similar concepts. Thanks in advance
    AWS, Azure, GCP, ISC2, GIAC, ISACA, TOGAF, SABSA, EC-Council, Comptia...
  • Options
    yoba222yoba222 Member Posts: 1,237 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Revisiting this thread. I ended up not going for the CSX and instead am studying the CompTIA CSA+, which looks remarkably similar to this. I don't remember the GCIH having all that much log reviewing, which seems to be a heavy theme for the CSX.

    I challenged the GCIH without going through the training. I've heard good things about the training, but man is it expensive.
    A+, Network+, CCNA, LFCS,
    Security+, eJPT, CySA+, PenTest+,
    Cisco CyberOps, GCIH, VHL,
    In progress: OSCP
Sign In or Register to comment.