BuzzSaw wrote: » I think your approach sounds pretty solid given your background. To answer your question, I found Boson to be fairly accurate in terms of what the test is like. In fact there may be a few times the test was easier than Boson. My my only suggestion to add would be the following: 1. Georgia Weidman's Advanced Pen Testing course on Cybrary (free) 2. Build a small lab. This will vary in cost or it could be done with some of the entry level free virtualization software. 3. Practice on some Vulhub machines, or other purposely vulnerable systems.
Z0sickx wrote: » I must say the BOSON simulation test was...quite hard..i feel like **** now.. i feel reading the sybex book didn't even cover half the stuff i asked
Z0sickx wrote: » bump on metasploit knowledge needed for exam?
Z0sickx wrote: » i'm using the SYBEX V9 test book (free as contractor). took one of the practice test and got about 24 questions wrong so thats around 80% pass rate. i am also using the CEH v8 test engine but its weighted differently then v9 so i get about 66-70% on that. At the top of my head I seem pretty bad at remembering the Different Malware/viruses/ and what each did what, along with the which tool is appropriate for each situation, also NetBios, SMB, and some of the stupid terminology. its all doable it just getting that material set in stone in my head also are there any metasploit specific questions on the exam? all my practice test so far have no really had any..only see it as multiple choice question for something unrelated also got the 7 day free trial for CBT nuggets so i'm going to watch those videos since that seems to help with my learning, and what helped me passing the CASP
BuzzSaw wrote: » Make sure you are taking notes, either on paper or an app like OneNote or something. In my experience writing notes helps concrete things in pretty well. I would just make sure you are being efficient with your studying and you'll get there. When are you testing?
CuttlefishJones wrote: » I'm in a similar boat, only that I have a couple of weeks to get up to speed I'm using Skillset (really not worth the money, most of the questions seem to have been written by a dyslexic yoda), the official Sybex v9 study guide - covers all the topics but with almost zero depth, and the Matt Walker v8 study guide which is much, mucg more in depth than the official guide. There is a new version of the Matt Walker book coming out next week though that covers the v9. Which I am definitely going to get. Also check out https://scadahacker.com/library/ as there is a huge amount of useful documentation here including a crib sheet for the CEH (it's old but still quite handy). I've also got Kali running in a VM and a stack of other VM (mix of linux, windows, metaspoitable, a honeypot) running to abuse at will. And also hit the wiki, you can create your own books from articles to create a study guid of your own. Something I am fidnig very useful. I've also signed up for Cybrary.it and am currently working through the Pentesting and Ethical Hacking course and the Advanced Penetration Course. Though there is loads of good stuff on there as well. And yes, I'm not sleeping much at the moment (:
BuzzSaw wrote: » You both should also check out Georgia Weidman's course on Cybrary - it is pretty Kali specific, but I think it is a good compliment with the CEH studies.
kalik wrote: » You can laugh at skillset questions and the workding - I agree it's ridiculous sometimes, but the fact is - some of those questions are identical to the exam questions (with the retarded wording as well). I've only done around 300 questions and I found at least 1 identical question on the exam. All I did was 2 weeks of studying the official ECC CEHv9 documentation and doing those 300 questions on skillset - 2 weeks later I was CEH, so it really is enough.