Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026
beads wrote: » You get out of it, what you put into it. Just don't call them academically equal - they aren't. Academic reputation will always or I hope it will be, important. If your pursuing a bachelor's or Master's simply to pass an HR filter and spend as little cash as possible its going to show in the quality of your efforts elsewhere.
beads wrote: » Full disclosure. Leo and once worked together. He can attest "I talk to much". - b/eads
PJ_Sneakers wrote: » Honestly, the only reason I am in WGU is because it fits my life best out of all the options I had available. I'd very much prefer to earn a more respected degree. I don't mind saying that at all, because it is the truth. However, it would actually be impossible for me without sacrificing my family's stability. I can actually say with 100% confidence that it'd be impossible for me to manage both a traditional B&M program and my family without sacrificing one or the other. So I made a decision. I compromised my education for a more stable family. My father did the opposite, and I remember what it did to my childhood. He is extremely successful now, but even today I do not consider him to be my primary male role model despite all of the hard facts. But this is just where my life has taken me. Everyone is different, and everyone's circumstances are unique. Hindsight is 20/20, right?
Danielm7 wrote: » I'm looking at what, 4 years or so? That's a lot to ask of my family.
TranceSoulBrother wrote: » WGU in the end is just another educational model similar to various others introduced before. No one cared much for correspondence courses or boarding school or video courses or even online education when first introduced. But eventually, all these mediums gain traction among a subset of people that can benefit from it. So instead of ragging on WGU proper, what we should take out of it is the advice of the BTDTs (Been There Done That) for the others or even amongst ourselves to benefit most from this kind of education. Everyone will otherwise rag on WGU, just like they do on UoP/Ashford/TUI...For God's sakes, when articles are printed about grade inflation at Harvard and Brown or sexual harassment at UCLA or Duke, who posts to say don't study there? There is always controversy about all these issues. Just google the myriad threads about Harvard Extension School and whether their alumni qualify as "true" Harvard grads. What I would ask from WGU deans is that they should peruse these kind of boards to review the real student feedback, not the canned crap gleaned from their online survey or email spam. These threads are what should be used to improve the student's educational experience and improve taskstream grading, course design and production, mentor/student relations and much more. WGU will benefit a certain subset of people as mentioned repeatedly, despite any naysayers on here or other boards. Employers will still hire WGU grads.
beads wrote: » You lack of grammatical detail above says you we're likely rather angry when you wrote that mess or you lack of valid English credentials is shining through - admirably. I believe I iterated my concerns with grade inflation. Given today's low, low grading standards and emphasis on "safe spaces", historical diversity and participation awards I can see where institutions like WGU are attractive to low achievers. Truth be told compared to 20 years ago I feel a bit cheated having to actually work for grades and class position. No one gets 'C's anymore in brick and mortar schools. Its all pay for play now. Feel better now? - b/eads
beads wrote: » You lack of grammatical detail above says you we're likely rather angry when you wrote that mess or you lack of valid English credentials is shining through - admirably.
beads wrote: » [...] Personally, I do not give a hoot that seven state Governor's cobbled together "fuax-U", its not a viable school as far as I am concerned. [...] Full disclosure. Leo and once worked together. He can attest "I talk to much". - b/eads
joemc3 wrote: » Let's be honest, most classes undergrad classes outside of ivy are not that hard.
PJ_Sneakers wrote: » Someone get a ref in here, stat!
goatama wrote: » It's all good. People get cranky.
danny069 wrote: » I agree, WGU is bourgeois.
beads wrote: Relying strictly on questionable certifications to receive a "degree"
beads wrote: Again, I am supposed to keep a straight face when you compare taking the CEH to writing my own attack code within a major thesis?
beads wrote: Perhaps watching PBS is what most people consider education
beads wrote: If your pursuing a bachelor's or Master's simply to pass an HR filter and spend as little cash as possible its going to show in the quality of your efforts elsewhere.
beads wrote: Known many working adults working two jobs or one position with children who have managed to finish an education and be a role model for their children in the process.
beads wrote: You lack of grammatical detail above says you we're likely rather angry when you wrote that mess or you lack of valid English credentials is shining through - admirably.
DatabaseHead wrote: » @ Volf - Didn't hurt my friend out of the military either. He's doing better than the median salary in IT with a bachelors from U of P. So much more to this formula, aptitude, personality, opportunities, relations, everything else......
Exclusively for TechExam members. Applies to boot camps starting before April 30, 2026.