Options
DMZ vs VM
Will the use of DMZ in network infrastructure decrease due to increase use of VMs nowadays?
What are the Pros and Cons?
What are the Pros and Cons?
"If you want to kick the tiger in his ass, you'd better have a plan for dealing with his teeth."
Comments
-
Options
636-555-3226
Member Posts: 975 ■■■■■□□□□□
IMO VM is just another way of saying "computer." A VM is as secure as you make it, just like your Windoze & *nix boxes. -
Options
TheFORCE
Member Posts: 2,297 ■■■■■■■■□□
Two totally different things. DMZ's do not function like VM's -
OptionsOctalDump
Member Posts: 1,722
No. You just virtualise the DMZ, or rather security zones, since it's typical to have more than just an inside, outside and DMZ these days.
I actually ran this infrastructure at a small company. We set up a separate virtual network for external development, with a separate NIC (could be a shared NIC with different VLAN) and access to internet. The external developers could then access this environment without access to the rest of our system - some of which was on the same VM host.2017 Goals - Something Cisco, Something Linux, Agile PM -
Options
blargoe
Member Posts: 4,174 ■■■■■■■■■□
The use of dedicated metal for DMZ decreases. DMZ itself doesn't.IT guy since 12/00
Recent: 11/2019 - RHCSA (RHEL 7); 2/2019 - Updated VCP to 6.5 (just a few days before VMware discontinued the re-cert policy...)
Working on: RHCE/Ansible
Future: Probably continued Red Hat Immersion, Possibly VCAP Design, or maybe a completely different path. Depends on job demands...