My wife is planning to get her PMP
willanderson1111
Posts: 43Member ■■□□□□□□□□
My wife would like to have a career change and is looking at this cert. She have a bachelor degree in marketing and have been working as a receptionist at a dental office. What do you guys recommend for her to quickly get her 4,500 hours and 35 hours?
Taken from their website:
Prerequisites
Secondary degree (high school diploma, associate’s degree or the global equivalent)
7,500 hours leading and directing projects
35 hours of project management education
OR
Four-year degree
4,500 hours leading and directing projects
35 hours of project management education
Taken from their website:
Prerequisites
Secondary degree (high school diploma, associate’s degree or the global equivalent)
7,500 hours leading and directing projects
35 hours of project management education
OR
Four-year degree
4,500 hours leading and directing projects
35 hours of project management education
0
Comments
LR
Getting experience will be a lot harder. If she does not have any experience leading a project (which it sounds like she doesn't), she may want to start with CAPM exam first which will give her more to work with when applying for PM or coordinator positions.
Currently Working On: Microsoft 70-761 (SQL Server)
Sorry, I have no valuable contribution. Best of luck to her!
Dude, I was thinking exactly that! My wife is planning to get her pimp - sounds like a Jerry Springer episode title.
"You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try." - Homer Simpson
Arthur Ashe
That's anecdotal at best......
Any IT shop worth their weight in salt have moved to some derivative of agile. GANTT charts have been replaced by Kanban boards and long planning cycles are no longer tolerated and have been replaced by the 2 week sprints. Anyone who has been in app development knows this. With the business leaders driving the business they don't want to be told no we are to ridged and inflexible to change scope. If IT is not enabling their business to go to market fast they are worthless.
PMP aligns with Waterfall and that's why they are desperately getting into the agile space. It's real world, intuitive and worth something...
Currently Working On: eJPT, Learning: Linux/CLI, Git, Python, Pentesting
Next Up: eJPT, eCPPTv2, OSCP
Studying: Code Academy (CLI, Git, Python), eLearnSecurity PTSv3
There are a couple of different ways of looking at this. I'll retract my statement and reinstate it by saying: The PMP not as valuable as it once was and in the future will become even less valuable.
Couple of points to be made why this is happening.
The PMP was originally designed ~1980. It's an old methodology that for the most part has stolen operational, financial, risk, quality and a few other management disciplines. Anyone who went to a decent school will have some exposure to these. In fact anyone who reads a decent book on these individual management disciplines can gain enough knowledge.
This discipline is really all about physical projects. Building bridges over massive rivers, new casino, and large physical infrastructure projects. Once the concrete is poured for these buildings its realllllly expensive to redo that work. Same with electrical contractors etc.... These need massive planning cycles, you can't half ass a bridge and expect thousands of people to drive over it everyday, the business is assuming way to much risk. For these types of projects it's great. I would even bucket data center build outs, with generators and all supporting infrastructure falling into the category. So it has value but.......
Most IT / Business projects don't align or require that type of project management style. In fact most of you aren't project managers, you are project coordinators or leads with some responsibilities. Even if your title says PM.
The business / IT / BI pretty much all verticals are using agile methodologies to manage their projects. Usually have a charter or scope document with some light planning and heavy execution cycles with a major focus on iterative mindset and encouraging scope change to better suit the business. This methodology has flaws but is far superior to Waterfall.
That's why you see agile tools being used over the traditional tools. I can't tell you the last I saw a GANTT chart, they don't exist and if they do they are generally high level fluff on a PowerPoint with some artificial time lines. Companies have elected to go with Kanban boards, backlogs with grooming sessions, daily stand ups, sometimes just weekly and a whole host of other techniques. This is reality you can face or not, I don't care to be honest.
Over the course of 3 years I have interviewed and had casual conversations with recruiters in regards to positions that require a certain element of project coordination. To be blunt, they want agile, period.
What they don't care about
MS Project / Gantt charts
Bloated project documentation (Risk registers, supplier scorecards etc.......)
Anything waterfall, it actually can hurt you..... I've seen it, it's happened to me.
What they want
Are you comfortable working in team rooms?
Are you comfortable dealing with 15 minute SCRUMS in the morning?
Can provide reporting to senior leadership out of JIRA, using Epics, stories, sub stories while managing your project deliverables?
Do you have understanding of backlogs and why they exist?
Kanban boards
Moving scope
I honestly don't care if you think my advice is crap or not. Bottom line is your post was relevant in 2008, not 2018.....
Agree, the waterfall methodology is outdated and should never be used
I definitely agree about the bloated documentation.
The PMP is more valuable for me because it is a JOB REQUIREMENT as it is in many large organizations.
I manage data center programs and projects and I use waterfall, scrum and kanban. They're tools that I use to get the job done depending on the situation.
Arthur Ashe