plz delete

SpetsRepairSpetsRepair Member Posts: 210 ■■■□□□□□□□
plz delete


  • networker050184networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
    Preferably re-IP. Worst case scenario NAT. No one ever wants to re-IP because it's work, but it's the right answer.
    An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
  • Fulcrum45Fulcrum45 Member Posts: 621 ■■■■■□□□□□
    /8? Good grief. I've never had to reorganize anything that large but it sounds like Networker is right; redesign and start over.
  • xagreusxagreus Member Posts: 112 ■■■■□□□□□□
    It sounds like this might be a great place to use VRF-lite (Virtual Routing and Forwarding), where you can have separate VRF instances, each with its own (or other private IP ranges). That way they don't actually overlap. To allow them to communicate with each other, you have to set up static routes or leaks between VRFs.

    Here's a brief overview:

    I'm still pretty new to this concept, so I may not have the details right, but I think that's generally how VRFs work. I hope someone with more networking experience can offer corrections and/or wisdom regarding whether this might help in SpetsRepair's situation.
    A+, Net+, Sec+, CySA+, CCNA, ITIL 2011 Foundation, AWS CCP, ISC2 CC, MS SC-900, MS AZ-900
    2024 goals: AZ-900, Cloud+, Palo Alto PCNSA, CyberOps Associate, DevNet Associate, Project+
Sign In or Register to comment.