Here is where I am at, failed my Security+ about a month and a half ago. Studied my ass off with two new books, and three or four practice engines, and FAILED it again a week ago, made a 635 the first time. I improved drastically and failed the second time with a 729, Damn.. So Close. Three months of long nights of studying and not to mention $450. Well Thats life, I'll go for it again in a month or so... But for now 70-291...
I have to say I am definitely nervous from all the posts about how hard this test is

But from my last experience I am definitely gonna study my ass off again. I have the big blue microsft book (70-291 self study course.) I have a CBT course, and I also have a test engine with about four hundred questions. I also have a few sound clips and another study guide.
Just wondering how cenceptual is this test? Security+ was all conceptual. Is this pretty straighforward as long as I have an in depth understanding of DHCP, DNS, RRAS, Subnetting, Network Monitor, DHCP Relay, WINS, Netbios, and basically everything else covered by the microsoft book. I do plan on using other resources to enhance my knowledge of individual subjects.
A question for those have taken the test. How many questions are brought up concerning the size of subnets compared to how many hosts and vice versa, and also all the other IP Address concerned formulations

: