Frame Relay - reason for hub and spoke
cambei
Member Posts: 62 ■■■□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
Hi guys. I have been wondering about this for a while and even asked a guy at my work who came up with a possible reason.
Basically, when using frame relay, all the materials I have read/watched speak of having a hub and spoke topology. So if we have 2 sites we want to connect with FR, one in the UK and one in the USA. Can we not just have the UK router connected to a frame switch and the USA router connected to the same frame switch? Without a third router? Is this third router necessary to route from one site to another? Or is it more for larger FR networks to cut down on the amount of DLCIs needed? So that each site only needs one DLCI to one router?
I hope this makes at least some sense.
Basically, when using frame relay, all the materials I have read/watched speak of having a hub and spoke topology. So if we have 2 sites we want to connect with FR, one in the UK and one in the USA. Can we not just have the UK router connected to a frame switch and the USA router connected to the same frame switch? Without a third router? Is this third router necessary to route from one site to another? Or is it more for larger FR networks to cut down on the amount of DLCIs needed? So that each site only needs one DLCI to one router?
I hope this makes at least some sense.
Comments
-
MrD Member Posts: 441If you only have 2 locations you just need a point-to-point network. Hub & Spoke is basically a partial mesh topology when there are 3 or more sites, so as to cut down on the cost of having a full mesh.
-
cambei Member Posts: 62 ■■■□□□□□□□SWEET! Thank you.
That's what the guy from work thought it would be, but we were unsure.
PS: I am wearing a T-shirt with your avatar on -
Yankee Member Posts: 157You probably don't want a long distance point to point between the US and the UK as it is very expensive. A PVC between the two ain't cheap either but is the more affordable solution between the two choices.
Yankee -
EdTheLad Member Posts: 2,111 ■■■■□□□□□□Yankee wrote:You probably don't want a long distance point to point between the US and the UK as it is very expensive. A PVC between the two ain't cheap either but is the more affordable solution between the two choices.
Yankee
I think you are confusing a leased line with FR point-to-point pvc.Networking, sometimes i love it, mostly i hate it.Its all about the $$$$ -
rossonieri#1 Member Posts: 799 ■■■□□□□□□□ed_the_lad wrote:
I think you are confusing a leased line with FR point-to-point pvc.
nice answer ed:)
dont mixed up with topology and DLCI usage.the More I know, that is more and More I dont know. -
Yankee Member Posts: 157I'm not mixing anything up, as I control a large US network connected to the UK, Europe and India amongst other places. We used frame-relay for years, but are now in the process of changing to save cost. Perhaps he misspoke in the phrasing of the initial response as a hub and spoke network is still point to point frame-relay in a well designed network. You don't use the phrase point to point and not mean a leased line when speaking to a carrier in any nation.
Yankee -
EdTheLad Member Posts: 2,111 ■■■■□□□□□□Yankee wrote:You don't use the phrase point to point and not mean a leased line when speaking to a carrier in any nation.
YankeeNetworking, sometimes i love it, mostly i hate it.Its all about the $$$$ -
mp3spy Member Posts: 86 ■■□□□□□□□□ed_the_lad wrote:Yankee wrote:You don't use the phrase point to point and not mean a leased line when speaking to a carrier in any nation.
Yankee
thats right!Ok CCNA BREAK IS OVER, TIME FOR CCSP!!! -
Yankee Member Posts: 157Then it would be important that people learn to use proper terms, so they don't get confused.
Yankee -
mgeorge Member Posts: 774 ■■■□□□□□□□mp3spy, you're avatar is soo cute ^_^ reminds me about how I feel some times when I'm working on a 75,000 node+ network lol >.< oh yeah and of course, 10,000 of those people are complaining lol...There is no place like 127.0.0.1