IP question
Can someone give me some information on the IP address 169.254.x.x. From what I understand, this IP address is given when the DHCP server cannot be found. I have a client who trying to connect to the city's free WiFi connection. From what he's telling me, I'm thinking he's too far away to get a decent signal. He's going to get close to the city and try it. But really I'm looking on more info on the 169.254.x.x IP address. Anyone have a link to some info?
In the meantime I'll be checking my favorsite site Google.
In the meantime I'll be checking my favorsite site Google.
Working on Linux+
Comments
-
sprkymrk Member Posts: 4,884 ■■■□□□□□□□That is the APIP range, Automatic Privat IP, that a MS client assigns to itself when there is no DHCP server available. You are probably correct in assuming he is too far to get a signal.All things are possible, only believe.
-
Sie Member Posts: 1,195[Edit - What Sprkymrk said he just types faster ]Foolproof systems don't take into account the ingenuity of fools
-
JDMurray Admin Posts: 13,089 AdminYup, if a Windows DHCP client doesn't receive a response from a DHCP server, Windows will eventually assign itself an Automatic Private IP Addressing (APIPA) address in the 169.254/16 network. This happens all the time with 802.11 wireless clients.
Private network
Automatic Private IP Addressing (APIPA) -
TechJunky Member Posts: 881Do they have DHCP disabled for the Wireless Interface so people dont leech off the connection?
Try using a 192.x.x.x, 10.x.x.x, or 172.x.x.x if you know the LAN IP Addressing. -
blargoe Member Posts: 4,174 ■■■■■■■■■□Or they're just out of IP addressesIT guy since 12/00
Recent: 11/2019 - RHCSA (RHEL 7); 2/2019 - Updated VCP to 6.5 (just a few days before VMware discontinued the re-cert policy...)
Working on: RHCE/Ansible
Future: Probably continued Red Hat Immersion, Possibly VCAP Design, or maybe a completely different path. Depends on job demands... -
JDMurray Admin Posts: 13,089 AdminTechJunky wrote:Do they have DHCP disabled for the Wireless Interface so people dont leech off the connection?
-
sprkymrk Member Posts: 4,884 ■■■□□□□□□□I have a client who trying to connect to the city's free WiFi connection.
I would assume a city's free wi-fi would not have any layer 2 authentication. A subscription or fee-based wi-fi might, but that doesn't sound like the case here.All things are possible, only believe. -
mrhaun03 Member Posts: 359The client told me the first 2 hours of connectivity are free. You would think that there'd be some sort of authentication. It seems it would be too easy to get around the 2 hour limit.Working on Linux+
-
JDMurray Admin Posts: 13,089 Adminmrhaun03 wrote:The client told me the first 2 hours of connectivity are free. You would think that there'd be some sort of authentication. It seems it would be too easy to get around the 2 hour limit.
-
mrhaun03 Member Posts: 359After your 2 hours are up, couldn't spoof your MAC address? Although, the average user probably isn't aware of a MAC address or how to change it.Working on Linux+
-
JDMurray Admin Posts: 13,089 Adminmrhaun03 wrote:After your 2 hours are up, couldn't spoof your MAC address? Although, the average user probably isn't aware of a MAC address or how to change it.