nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

NTFS compression question

ccnpninja

Hi,

What may be the advantage of compressing a folder with NTFS and keeping its subfolders and files without NTFS compression

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your Microsoft Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View Microsoft Boot Camps

Comments

Mishra

shadowman724 wrote:

Hi,

What may be the advantage of compressing a folder with NTFS and keeping its subfolders and files without NTFS compression ?

The files in the subfolders may need the performance of non-compressed files.

Example might be...

c:\application\bigfile.txt
c:\application\readme.txt
c:\application\database\onlinedatabase.edb

You see that the database is located in a subfolder which needs good read/write performance. So you would compressed the files under application but not the database subfolder.

ccnpninja

Thanks