SSCP Value - In relation to new CISSP Req's
I was wondering about something and wanted to get a few opinions on the subject. Why is it that there are only 589 SSCP certified individuals? Compared to the nearly 50,000 CISSP count, considering that the CISSP is supposed to be so much harder to obtain, it seems out of cater for 2 certification tracks by the same organization (ISC2).
Is the SSCP a worth while cert at all? Do employers know about it? Does anyone think it will gain in popularity when the new CISSP requirements kick in?
My questions stem from a couple of factors, but mainly because I noticed the SSCP is now an accepted elective towards the MCSA:Security specialization. I was planning on taking the ISA 2004 exam to fulfill the requirement, until I saw the SSCP. I thought it would be a better all-around certification. But I am thinking the SSCP might be a cert with a very low ROI, unless the new (more strict) requirements for the CISSP make the SSCP increase in popularity.
Opinions?
Is the SSCP a worth while cert at all? Do employers know about it? Does anyone think it will gain in popularity when the new CISSP requirements kick in?
My questions stem from a couple of factors, but mainly because I noticed the SSCP is now an accepted elective towards the MCSA:Security specialization. I was planning on taking the ISA 2004 exam to fulfill the requirement, until I saw the SSCP. I thought it would be a better all-around certification. But I am thinking the SSCP might be a cert with a very low ROI, unless the new (more strict) requirements for the CISSP make the SSCP increase in popularity.
Opinions?
All things are possible, only believe.
Comments
I think the problem with SSCP is it was never seriously marketed. Not only that, it was created AFTER the CISSP gained the reputation of being the "Gold Standard" of information security certs. So whoever was qualified (and even those who weren't) attempted the cert. One of my employees just got his CISSP back a few months ago, and his ID Number is something like 130765, that means at least 130,765 people have attempted the exam. My license number is 808XX, so when I got mine almost 3 years ago, the count of attempts was at 80,000. So it's pretty safe to assume that out of 131,000 tries, only 50,000 have been successful. Whereas the SSCP percentages are A LOT higher than that. It's just hard for SSCP to compete with CISSP when it's marketed so heavily and hyped by the media so much. In some places, (many places), you can walk in and say the sky is falling; if you've got CISSP behind your name, they will believe it's actually falling. So with that kind of hype, and SSCP being considered "the baby brother" it's not so shocking.
By the way, ISA is a good one.
I know it shows up in the cert planner, but did you see if somewhere else? The reason i'm asking is that I read in another forum where someones emailed MS and they were told the listing was not right and it would be removed the next time the cert planner was updated.
I don't know how valuable the cert is. When I was looking through Security job ads recently to see how popular the CIW: Security cert was, I only saw the SSCP mentioned a few times. If a certification was mentioned it was usually the CISSP, followed by the Security+.
2020 Goals: 0 of 2 courses complete, 0 of 2 exams complete
Thanks for that information ajs. I just saw it in the cert planner, that's all. It was curious that I hadn't heard about it before.
Based on these factors I think I will stick to my original plan of ISA 2004 for now.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
On a scale of 1 to 20, if the Sec+ is a 1 and the CISSP is a 20, were does the SSCP fall?
2020 Goals: 0 of 2 courses complete, 0 of 2 exams complete
I would say a 10
I don't have much experience on security exams but I would think anyone going for the CISSP would want the SSCP just because it is as stepping stone, just like anyone going for MCSE should go ahead and get MCSA while they are at it.