Well, I'll leave this up to you guys to decide

techgeek07

I'm checking out the Sec + for my next exam after Net +. I was going through amazon and checking out customer reviews on different books on the subject. The top review on one of the books says that that book is not substitute for two **** sites, naming the dumpsites. I'm guessing he doesn't realize that they're **** sites or mabey doesn't know even what they are. I tried reporting it, hoping I could put in a comment, but, all it did was report it. I don't want to blind side the guy, but, seriously, It probably shouldn't be there...

janmike

You are right in trying to stop publicity for the ****. If you browse Techexams forums, you will find a lot of comments about these "brain" ****--none of them good. You are to be commended.

I would also say that anyone who seeks computer/network security certification through use of a brain ****, has no business in security. IT security itself always goes straight to the question of pursuing criminal prosecution, depending on the results of investigation. **** are illegal, and the people who support and use them are performing an illegal act. So, I do not think that they are qualified to guarantee the security of any system--even if they are certified.

Well, that is about a nickel's-worth of opinion, but I think that all Techexamers agree with me.

Good luck to you on your path to Network+ certification, and your future.