quick summarization question
rakem
Member Posts: 800
in CCNA & CCENT
say i have 4 networks, with these IP addresses
192.168.0.1 /24
192.168.1.1 /24
192.168.2.1 /24
192.168.3.1 /24
these could be summarized as 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0 right?
since this mask would allow for ranges from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.4.0
hence the command i could use to manually summarize these would be:
ip summary-address eigrp 10 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0
192.168.0.1 /24
192.168.1.1 /24
192.168.2.1 /24
192.168.3.1 /24
these could be summarized as 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0 right?
since this mask would allow for ranges from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.4.0
hence the command i could use to manually summarize these would be:
ip summary-address eigrp 10 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0
CCIE# 38186
showroute.net
showroute.net
Comments
-
wait2dominate Member Posts: 74 ■■□□□□□□□□The only thing I saw 'wrong' was the range....it should be from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.3.255, not 192.168.4.0. 4.0 is a new network.Brake lights are a sign your car doesn't handle well enough.
CCNP or MCSE is next to come. -
dtlokee Member Posts: 2,378 ■■■■□□□□□□rakem wrote:say i have 4 networks, with these IP addresses
192.168.0.1 /24
192.168.1.1 /24
192.168.2.1 /24
192.168.3.1 /24
these could be summarized as 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0 right?
since this mask would allow for ranges from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.4.0
hence the command i could use to manually summarize these would be:
ip summary-address eigrp 10 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0
The reange would be 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.3.0 with that summary address, so that is correct.The only easy day was yesterday! -
rakem Member Posts: 800wait2dominate wrote:The only thing I saw 'wrong' was the range....it should be from 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.3.255, not 192.168.4.0. 4.0 is a new network.
ah yea of course... cheers guys.CCIE# 38186
showroute.net