Inter Vlan Communication

lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
I have a 2924 with 2 PC's connected to it, along with a 1760. I am trying to provide inter vlan communication with the 2 PC's, is the 1760 capable of this? I thought it was but i remember reading somewere that the 1700 series wont support ISL which i bleieve is necessary

Comments

  • bighornsheepbighornsheep Member Posts: 1,506
    It seems like according to this:
    http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml

    As long as your switch supports Trunking, and your router has a fastethernet (100mb) connection, you can do it.
    Jack of all trades, master of none
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    even on that they only mention models 2600 and higher though
  • dtlokeedtlokee Member Posts: 2,378 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Acording to the feature navigator it is available on the 1760, it may be your IOS version. You may need an IOS upgrade, what version do you have?
    The only easy day was yesterday!
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Version 12.2(15)T5
  • mgeorgemgeorge Member Posts: 774 ■■■□□□□□□□
    do a sh ver and post it plz :)
    There is no place like 127.0.0.1
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
    IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-Y-M), Version 12.2(15)T5,  RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    
    TAC Support: [url]http://www.cisco.com/tac[/url]
    Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Thu 12-Jun-03 08:20 by eaarmas
    Image text-base: 0x80008120, data-base: 0x80991480
    
    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    
    Cairo uptime is 0 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System restarted at 13:37:44 UTC Mon Jul 5 2004
    System image file is "flash:c1700-y-mz.122-15.T5.bin"
    
    cisco 1760 (MPC860P) processor (revision 0x500) with 54148K/11388K bytes of memo
    ry.
    Processor board ID FOC08130U3E (2493369937), with hardware revision 0000
    MPC860P processor: part number 5, mask 2
    Bridging software.
    X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
    1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
    1 Serial network interface(s)
    WIC T1-DSU
    32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    32768K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
    
    Configuration register is 0x2102
    
  • bighornsheepbighornsheep Member Posts: 1,506
    lex0429 wrote:
    even on that they only mention models 2600 and higher though
    Cisco 3600 and 4500/4700 series routers, or other members of the Cisco 2600 series routers, with FastEthernet interfaces, and any Catalyst 2900XL, 3500XL, 2940, 2950 or 2970 can be used in the scenarios presented in this document to obtain the same results.
    Jack of all trades, master of none
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    here is the config im working with

    Router

    int fa 0/0
    no ip address
    int fa 0/0.2
    encapsulation dot1q 2
    ip address 192.168.1.129 255.255.255.240
    int fa 0/0.3
    encapsulation dot1q 3
    ip address 192.168.1.33 255.255.255.240


    Switch

    int fa 0/1 - connected to fa 0/0 of router
    switchport mode trunk
    int fa 0/10 - connected to PC1
    switchport access vlan 2
    int fa 0/12 - Connected to PC2
    switchport access vlan 3


    PC1 Ip Config
    192.168.1.142
    255.255.255.240
    192.168.1.129

    PC2 Ip Config
    192.168.1.34
    255.255.255.240
    192.168.1.33

    i cant even ping the gateways from each computer
  • Darthn3ssDarthn3ss Member Posts: 1,096
    can you ping the switch? is there an IP applied on it anywhere?
    Fantastic. The project manager is inspired.

    In Progress: 70-640, 70-685
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    yes the switch has an ip 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.240 but i cant ping it. I assume thats because given the network mask, the switch is on a different segment. Is this incorrect thinking?

    when i change the ip address of the computer from 192.168.1.47 to 192.168.1.10 i can ping the switch fine
  • networker050184networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
    Ensure the switchport is encapsulated for dot1q and not isl.
    An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Ensure the switchport is encapsulated for dot1q and not isl.

    Looks like that did the trick. Thanks so much
  • networker050184networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
    No problem, or you could have switched the router encapsulation to isl. Either way as long as they match.
    An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
  • mgeorgemgeorge Member Posts: 774 ■■■□□□□□□□
    Apparently it looks like you got everything working :)

    but in the mean time you should try to upgrade to enterprise base

    example;
    c1700-entbasek9-mz.124-12.bin

    or if your wanting to preform everything on the router, upgrade your ram to 128 and get adv enterprise
    There is no place like 127.0.0.1
  • lex0429lex0429 Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    what are the benefits to enterprise base? i actually have it but never upgraded
Sign In or Register to comment.