Question about cisco VPN access
I set up a VPN on our company router and from outside the internet the only computer that can be accessed by the VPN is the DNS/Active directory server. After a user autheticates, they can ping hosts in the company but cannot access the host except the server. Anyone else know what might be the problem?
I know it is not a cisco problem because when I connect to the VPN server I can ping anything on the network but when it comes to network access only the server can be accessed. The hosts can be pinged but they cannot be accessed. I am going nuts right now.
I know it is not a cisco problem because when I connect to the VPN server I can ping anything on the network but when it comes to network access only the server can be accessed. The hosts can be pinged but they cannot be accessed. I am going nuts right now.
My daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/
http://techintuition.com/
Comments
-
leefdaddy Member Posts: 405how are you trying to access them??
is remote desktop enabled on the clients?Dustin Leefers -
nice343 Member Posts: 391leefdaddy wrote:how are you trying to access them??
is remote desktop enabled on the clients?
remote desktop works fine.
but when I do \\192.168.15.1 the host cannot be accessed, I get an error but when I ping 192.168.15.1 it works fine.
remote desktop works but that is not what I am experimenting with
the address are public not private, I don't want to type the public ones but I hope you get the ideaMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
paintb4707 Member Posts: 420nice343 wrote:leefdaddy wrote:how are you trying to access them??
is remote desktop enabled on the clients?
remote desktop works fine.
but when I do \\192.168.15.1 the host cannot be accessed, I get an error but when I ping 192.168.15.1 it works fine.
remote desktop works but that is not what I am experimenting with
the address are public not private, I don't want to type the public ones but I hope you get the idea
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the RPC command have to be used with a private address? -
nice343 Member Posts: 391paintb4707 wrote:nice343 wrote:leefdaddy wrote:how are you trying to access them??
is remote desktop enabled on the clients?
remote desktop works fine.
but when I do \\192.168.15.1 the host cannot be accessed, I get an error but when I ping 192.168.15.1 it works fine.
remote desktop works but that is not what I am experimenting with
the address are public not private, I don't want to type the public ones but I hope you get the idea
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the RPC command have to be used with a private address?
the address internal address are public not private. WhenI connect to the server I can ping everythin on the network but can only access the DNS serverMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
APA Member Posts: 959Do you have ACL's allowing the VPN IP range access to your internal clients???
CCNA | CCNA:Security | CCNP | CCIP
JNCIA:JUNOS | JNCIA:EX | JNCIS:ENT | JNCIS:SEC
JNCIS:SP | JNCIP:SP -
nice343 Member Posts: 391A.P.A wrote:Do you have ACL's allowing the VPN IP range access to your internal clients???
I have created a VPN pool but what happens is when a client connects over the internet, that Ip address is inserted into the routing table.
I don't have ACL blocking the range the VPN addresses. But I do have ACL on the router which permits pop3, smtp, dns and some of the regular ports, I don't know if thers a port I have to open for the VPN clients to be able to extablish connectivity more than just a ping? or it is just a microsoft problem not cisco?My daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
APA Member Posts: 959yeah thats fine... The range will always be inserted into the routing table........
But you will need to provide access so that the VPN range can access your internal clients. either IP for everything or tcp\udp for whatever ports you want them to access........
Are you able to provide some more info (eg the setup and what you currently have) this way we can get a better idea of where you are going wrong.....
I seriously think it is an access-permission issue.....
CCNA | CCNA:Security | CCNP | CCIP
JNCIA:JUNOS | JNCIA:EX | JNCIS:ENT | JNCIS:SEC
JNCIS:SP | JNCIP:SP -
nice343 Member Posts: 391Current configuration : 4156 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname Router
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
enable password xxxxxxxxxxx
!
aaa new-model
!
!
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa authorization network sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 local
!
!
aaa session-id common
ip cef
!
!
!
!
ip domain name xxxxxxxxxxxx
ip name-server xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
!
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
!
!
!
username xxxxxxx password 0 xxxxxx
username xxxxxxx privilege 15 secret 5 $1$W6qA$5ZeE7gV6otwRd/ts4oGvA.
username xxxxx privilege 15 secret 5 $1$X29A$8JANeNVDxebDScBhmWVr50
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
!
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
!
crypto isakmp client configuration group Bytesso
key xxxxxxxx
dns xxxxxxxx
domain xxxxxxxxx
pool SDM_POOL_1
netmask 255.255.255.248
crypto isakmp profile sdm-ike-profile-1
match identity group Bytesso
client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1
client configuration address respond
virtual-template 1
!
!
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
crypto ipsec profile SDM_Profile1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
set isakmp-profile sdm-ike-profile-1
!
!
!
!
ip local pool SDM_POOL_1 192.160.163.11 192.160.163.13
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/1
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile SDM_Profile1
everything works fine including remote desktop and ping, I just can't access files for some reason except the on on the DNS/ active directoryMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
APA Member Posts: 959So RDP is working???
Have you check your share permissions on the servers that you are trying to access????
Are the users using A.D to authenticate???
CCNA | CCNA:Security | CCNP | CCIP
JNCIA:JUNOS | JNCIA:EX | JNCIS:ENT | JNCIS:SEC
JNCIS:SP | JNCIP:SP -
nice343 Member Posts: 391A.P.A wrote:So RDP is working???
Have you check your share permissions on the servers that you are trying to access????
Are the users using A.D to authenticate???
users use local database on the router
remote desktop is working but I want the vpn clients to connect to access shared folders without
using remote desktopMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
blargoe Member Posts: 4,174 ■■■■■■■■■□so you can ping and rdp but not browse a share...
what is the exact error that you get?IT guy since 12/00
Recent: 11/2019 - RHCSA (RHEL 7); 2/2019 - Updated VCP to 6.5 (just a few days before VMware discontinued the re-cert policy...)
Working on: RHCE/Ansible
Future: Probably continued Red Hat Immersion, Possibly VCAP Design, or maybe a completely different path. Depends on job demands... -
nice343 Member Posts: 391blargoe wrote:so you can ping and rdp but not browse a share...
what is the exact error that you get?My daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
APA Member Posts: 959By using process of elimination..... What is different between the hosts you can't access and the DNS\A.D Server......?????
CCNA | CCNA:Security | CCNP | CCIP
JNCIA:JUNOS | JNCIA:EX | JNCIS:ENT | JNCIS:SEC
JNCIS:SP | JNCIP:SP -
nice343 Member Posts: 391A.P.A wrote:By using process of elimination..... What is different between the hosts you can't access and the DNS\A.D Server......?????
the hosts are connected over the internetMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
gojericho0 Member Posts: 1,059 ■■■□□□□□□□Can you UNC path into a workstation directly from the Server console and not going through the VPN?
-
nice343 Member Posts: 391gojericho0 wrote:Can you UNC path into a workstation directly from the Server console and not going through the VPN?
yesMy daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
gojericho0 Member Posts: 1,059 ■■■□□□□□□□OK, will the ACL on the router allow TCP ports 139 and 445 to connect to the hosts?
This is for Netbios and CIFS the protocols used for accessing file sharing -
Ahriakin Member Posts: 1,799 ■■■■■■■■□□Have you cleared port 445 on your router for the VPN subnets -> Private? Also what happens if you specify a share rather than try to enumerate them as you are doing (ie. \\192.168.xxx.xxx\c$ )?We responded to the Year 2000 issue with "Y2K" solutions...isn't this the kind of thinking that got us into trouble in the first place?
-
nice343 Member Posts: 391Ahriakin wrote:Have you cleared port 445 on your router for the VPN subnets -> Private? Also what happens if you specify a share rather than try to enumerate them as you are doing (ie. \\192.168.xxx.xxx\c$ )?My daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/ -
nice343 Member Posts: 391gojericho0 wrote:OK, will the ACL on the router allow TCP ports 139 and 445 to connect to the hosts?
This is for Netbios and CIFS the protocols used for accessing file sharing
should I permit any tcp connection to the internal network through ports 139 and 445?
is that what you are trying to say?My daily blog about IT and tech stuff
http://techintuition.com/