Security+ Exam
Can I start by saying I mean no offence by saying this.
I had a few mins spare at work and started reading through a Security+ Study Guide (Sybex) and so far (after three chapters) that the security+ material is very theory based / general overview of security topics as opposed to other exams.
Is this the case or have I just not read enough of the book!
Just a curious question really, not saying the exam is bad which ever way it is.
I had a few mins spare at work and started reading through a Security+ Study Guide (Sybex) and so far (after three chapters) that the security+ material is very theory based / general overview of security topics as opposed to other exams.
Is this the case or have I just not read enough of the book!
Just a curious question really, not saying the exam is bad which ever way it is.
Foolproof systems don't take into account the ingenuity of fools
Comments
-
sprkymrk
Member Posts: 4,884 ■■■□□□□□□□
Wait until you get to the boring stuff...
Yup, all theory, no hands-on.
All things are possible, only believe. -
Sie
Member Posts: 1,195
Is it worth taking towards MCSA: Security or would I be better placed (and learn more) from taking another (security) exam to gain MCSA:Security instead??Foolproof systems don't take into account the ingenuity of fools -
sprkymrk
Member Posts: 4,884 ■■■□□□□□□□
I think it's worth it. That way if a job description states either as a requirement you're covered.All things are possible, only believe.
-
Sie
Member Posts: 1,195
Cheers mate
Foolproof systems don't take into account the ingenuity of fools