Remote Access policy question.
JayrodEF
Member Posts: 111 ■□□□□□□□□□
I'm reviewing for the 291 exam and came across a question I didn't really get. It involves a question about dail-up remote acess polices and the way multiple policies are applied. Basically, it seems that policies must be applied in a certain order to obtain the desired result if certain restrictions apply to some groups but not to all. I don't recall reading anything about the order in which these policies must be applied. I then assumed policies would be applied from least to most restrictive, but that didn't seem to fit the answer the book gave for the order. I went back to the chapter and couldn't really find any good info on that either. So, does anyone have a quick guide to the reasoning behind the order of application for remote acess policies?
Comments
-
dynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/fc353fbb-4df4-4b36-b14a-20cbbad434941033.mspx?mfr=true
Are you using the MS Press book? If so, which question? I'll take a look at it. -
royal Member Posts: 3,352 ■■■■□□□□□□I remember this question. It's something about if they're domain admin and some are enterprise admin, etc... I don't remember the exact question though.
Remote Access Policies apply from top down. Once there is a match, that's it. So if you have the following Remote Access Policies:
Policy 1
Policy 2
Policy 3
User A matches policy 1. User A applies only Policy 1.
User B does not match Policy 1 but does match Policy 2. That user will apply Policy 2 and Policy 3 won't get checked.“For success, attitude is equally as important as ability.” - Harry F. Banks -
sprkymrk Member Posts: 4,884 ■■■□□□□□□□royal wrote:I remember this question. It's something about if they're domain admin and some are enterprise admin, etc... I don't remember the exact question though.
Remote Access Policies apply from top down. Once there is a match, that's it. So if you have the following Remote Access Policies:
Policy 1
Policy 2
Policy 3
User A matches policy 1. User A applies only Policy 1.
User B does not match Policy 1 but does match Policy 2. That user will apply Policy 2 and Policy 3 won't get checked.
Correct.
That should not to be confused with policy conditions. You can use "AND" inside your policies to make sure multiple conditions match. Such as:
Windows-Group matches "domain\RAS Users" AND
Client-IP-Address matches "192.168.10.*"All things are possible, only believe. -
JayrodEF Member Posts: 111 ■□□□□□□□□□Ah hah. That makes sense. And now that you mention it I do recall reading about that but I wasn't able to find it again obviously. Thanks for the link and all the help!