Options
opinion please : CUBE or SBC?
rossonieri#1
Member Posts: 799 ■■■□□□□□□□
hi guys,
i need your opinions regarding CUBE or new SBC hardware implementation.
in our smaller cloud we have multi-vendor edge routers (vary in size) providing NAT-ed access - as we all know, those NAT-ed may drop SIP sessions - just like we having now with class 4-5 switches.
for smaller edge routers - i think implementing CUBE is not an option (multi-vendor)? or shall i create an aggregated edge router and put an SBC as the edge routers? but this could lead to a major PEs overhaul
for bigger edge routers (also in bigger cloud) - do you think its best to just create a PBR on some edge to route SIPs to an SBC router like XR-series?
and, why does asterisk works fine with those NAT? that thing is brilliant.
thanking you for giving me the opinions.
i need your opinions regarding CUBE or new SBC hardware implementation.
in our smaller cloud we have multi-vendor edge routers (vary in size) providing NAT-ed access - as we all know, those NAT-ed may drop SIP sessions - just like we having now with class 4-5 switches.
for smaller edge routers - i think implementing CUBE is not an option (multi-vendor)? or shall i create an aggregated edge router and put an SBC as the edge routers? but this could lead to a major PEs overhaul
for bigger edge routers (also in bigger cloud) - do you think its best to just create a PBR on some edge to route SIPs to an SBC router like XR-series?
and, why does asterisk works fine with those NAT? that thing is brilliant.
thanking you for giving me the opinions.
the More I know, that is more and More I dont know.