Hi all. I'm looking for some feedback/critiques on my resume - it's under re-re-reconstruction at this point, and I would like to see what the general reaction is to it in its current form so I know if I'm on the right track here.
I know the bottom/footer got cut off when I converted it into a jpg for posting, so that part doesn't need critiquing, but I'm interested to see what the opinions are for the general layout, content, etc. I have a long history of working in construction administration, and rather than leave out non-IT jobs (which would leave me with GIGUNDO gaps in my history), I decided to try to focus on the "soft" skills that employers might like and the techy-type things that I did while I was at those non-techy places. Besides, most of my professional references are from my time in construction, and I have two kick-arse reference letters from former bosses in construction, so I feel like I need to have those included in my resume. But I would appreciate feedback on that decision...
Some specific feedback I'm looking for:
- should I drop the "Administaff University" stuff under the Education & Training section? It's corporate- or HR-type training for "soft skills," i.e. how to squeeze more out of your team & not being an arse to your co-workers, etc. One help desk interview I went on last year specifically mentioned these as a positive since they used the same training sessions (and said that it would put me on a fast track for management if I were to accept the job there), but other than that I haven't gotten much response to it, either positive or negative.
- do I drop the mention of the 1 class at MCC? It was basically an intro to computers class, and I'm not sure if it should stay.
- software: do I drop the construction-specific software (Corecon, AIA, Prolog, Timberline), or leave them on there? Will they confuse/distract people?
Any advice or input would be greatly appreciated!

*REMOVED*