Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
But that doesn't mean the port is going to be used for anything unless the connection between SWA and SWC goes down correct
jscimeca715 wrote: » Hello all, I've started reading Wendell Odom's ICND2 book and have a question about designated ports. Actually, it's more of a clarifying question, but a question nonetheless. I think this diagram might be confusing, but I'm going to try anyway. Switch A--Switch B--Switch C--Switch A (Imagine that this is a triangle and you should get the picture) Switch A is the root switch, and Switch B and Switch C have designated their root port. Now, for the connection between Switch B and Switch C, Switch C has a lower cost so it's put into forwarding and the Switch B port is put into blocking. So, what I'm trying to get at, is that Switch C's port on that segment is the Designated Port. But that doesn't mean the port is going to be used for anything unless the connection between SWA and SWC goes down correct? I know this is probably confusing so please let me know if I'm completely on the wrong track or not! Thanks in advance.
tim100 wrote: » If you set the cost on Switch C's port connecting to Switch B to a lower value it will become the root port and it will block it's port connecting to Switch A. So the topology will be: Switch C --- Switch B --- Switch A (root).
jscimeca715 wrote: » Hello all, I've started reading Wendell Odom's ICND2 book and have a question about designated ports. Actually, it's more of a clarifying question, but a question nonetheless. I think this diagram might be confusing, but I'm going to try anyway. Switch A--Switch B--Switch C--Switch A (Imagine that this is a triangle and you should get the picture) Switch A is the root switch, and Switch B and Switch C have designated their root port. Now, for the connection between Switch B and Switch C, Switch C has a lower cost so it's put into forwarding and the Switch B port is put into blocking.
jscimeca715 wrote: » So, what I'm trying to get at, is that Switch C's port on that segment is the Designated Port. But that doesn't mean the port is going to be used for anything unless the connection between SWA and SWC goes down correct?
jscimeca715 wrote: » I know this is probably confusing so please let me know if I'm completely on the wrong track or not! Thanks in advance.
tech-airman wrote: » jscimeca715,No, it is incorrect to state "...Switch C's port on that segment is the Designated Port." The root bridge has designated ports not designated bridges. In the case the link betwen SWA and SWC goes down, STP is run again to re-elect a new root bridge then designated bridges are appointed by the new root bridge. If the link between SWA and SWC goes down, then yes, the link between SWB and SWC becomes important.
kryolla wrote: » B will start to announce itself as the root because it lost its connection to the root bridge, C will hear and ignore an inferior BPDU on its blocking port, it will max age the stored BPDU and C will transition that port to forwarding or designated. You can probably find an article that will get more detailed but that the jist of it. edit look into backbone fast to speed up this process I just found this linkUnderstanding and Configuring Backbone Fast on Catalyst Switches - Cisco Systems
/usr wrote: » Unless I'm wrong and someone else corrects me... You've got it right. The DP on Switch C is simply the one that has been elected to stay up, since both ports that create that segment do not have to be down. That segment would not be used unless there is a change in the STP topology and Switch B brings up it's link.
So, what I'm trying to get at, is that Switch C's port on that segment is the Designated Port. But that doesn't mean the port is going to be used for anything unless the connection between SWA and SWC goes down correct?
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.