Options

Dynamic NAt question

adeeteeadeetee Member Posts: 79 ■■□□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :

access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62


The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63


Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...
Wish List :
CISSP...
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Options
    jmc012jmc012 Member Posts: 134
    adeetee wrote: »
    In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :

    access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62


    The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63


    Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
    Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...

    63 would be correct, not sure why they would have 62.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.