Dynamic NAt question
adeetee
Member Posts: 79 ■■□□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :
access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62
The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63
Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...
access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62
The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63
Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...
Wish List :
CISSP...
CISSP...
Comments
-
jmc012
Member Posts: 134
In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :
access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62
The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63
Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...
63 would be correct, not sure why they would have 62.