Dynamic NAt question

In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :

access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62

The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63

Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

jmc012

adeetee wrote: »

In all the practice questions I noticed that, if the private ip addresses to be translated are for instance, 192.168.6.65 - 192.168.6.126 /26... the statement for the ACL was as follows :

access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.65 0.0.0.62

The acl i wrote was - access-list 1 permit 192.168.6.64 0.0.0.63

Am I doing anything wrong here? Why have they mentioned 62 as wild card mask.. or are these both correct..
Regardless.. need to know why are they writing as 0.0.0.62...

63 would be correct, not sure why they would have 62.