Book now with code EOY2025
rpfutrell wrote: » At that point the transmission would begin again restablishing the initial window size at the next needed sequence number.
up2thetime wrote: » Ps.. what source did you use.. I am looking for some good information on TCP out of curiousity.. i find the books i am reading leave me with a lot of wondering and unanswered questions regarding this stuff..i guess this is because i am only using CCENT books... maybe TCP is covered more in depth somewhere else
up2thetime wrote: » Ahhhhh! I see....!! So after a segment gets lost, the receiver requests the lost segment specifically, and then the window is set up again..?? That is where I got messed up- not sure if the window had to be recreated after a lost segment happens It wouldn't make sense for the sender to send 5000 6000 and 7000 when the receiver didn't get 5000 specifically, but the receiver successfully got 6000. This just would be a waste since 6000 is received twice. Ps.. what source did you use.. I am looking for some good information on TCP out of curiousity.. i find the books i am reading leave me with a lot of wondering and unanswered questions regarding this stuff..i guess this is because i am only using CCENT books... maybe TCP is covered more in depth somewhere else
up2thetime wrote: I am looking for some good information on TCP
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!