OSPF Designated router Infor
Dear all,
I am working on OSPF lab but I just need to confirm that why we normally have two designated routers in a single area.
If we make only one designated router then what will be happened.
Regrads,
Toufiq
I am working on OSPF lab but I just need to confirm that why we normally have two designated routers in a single area.
If we make only one designated router then what will be happened.
Regrads,
Toufiq
Comments
By having only 1 DR, a link may fail and this failure will not be discovered by ospf for afew minutes until a new DR is elected, traffic could be unnecessarily block holed for a couple of minutes even if there is a backup route present in ospf.
Please also confirm below point.
If making a designated router so I will put high priority on DR interface then do we need to configure priority on remaining routers interfaces(less than DR) of OSPF network or we don't need to configure priority on remaining routers because of OSPF default priority(i.e. one) and I will make high priority of DR interface than a default priority.
Regards,
Toufiq
So yes just by making the priority of the DR to be higher will ensure it becomes the DR... But you need to remember that, this would not be the case all the time. There is no preempt function here.. so if there is a DR selected and exists in the network.. A higher priority router will not displace it..
HTH
-Hoogen
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
I just need simple definition of Type-7 LSA/NSSA with example, I mean why we need to implement it and its comparison with Type-5 LSAs.
Regards,
Toufiq
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
My another point is related to page number 181(JNCIP Book), here we are implementing policy to inject static routes into area 1 but we are also rejecting term 2 reject policy.
I mean if we have applied exact router-filter then it will defiantly allow the IPs related to this subnet and other will will not be allowed so why we need term 2 with reject.
In real exam, do we need to add static route with reject command under edit-routing options category or here we will add static route(without reject) and then apply the policy.
Please guide and thanks for usual support.
Regards,
Toufiq
The use of a discriminating route filter is used here to prevent the inadvertent redistribution of other static routes, such as the one associated with your fxp0 OoB network (in the event that you neglected to add the no-advertise tag when it was defined).
The static route presented was for example. They inject this route in R7 so that it doesn't enter area 10. reject keyword is just for the icmp packet handling
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
I am configuring NSSA but I have seen some policies on page 189.
can you guide me that what is the basic difference between external Type 1 and Type 2 commands because as per knowledge these are the metric types.
But I need some more clarification from you for better understanding and how these works, if applied accordingly.
Many Thanks for you cooperation.
Regards,
Toufiq
E1 or external type 1
R1--R2--R3
If R1 is redistributing routes with metric of X.. the route would have a cost of X + whatever the metric along its path until reaching R3.
E2 or External Type 2
If R1 is redistributing routes with metric of X.. the route retains its value on R3 also..i.e. X no addition.
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
Many thanks for you cooperation.
Let me see in book and I will contact you, if i need any help.
Regards,
Toufiq
Its page 229 In JNCIP book and 4th point in which metric value of 10 need to advertised with 420 tag towards backbone.after applying configuration I found that the results were not according to requirement(I mean according to book).
Please note that I am using olive for my Lab.
Router-1 Config:
============
[edit policy-options policy-statement external]
root# show
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 10.0.5.0/24 exact;
}
then {
metric 10;
tag 420;
external {
type 1;
}
accept;
}
}
term 2 {
then reject;
======================================
Results on R5.
[edit]
root# run show route 10.0.5.0/24
inet.0: 20 destinations, 20 routes (20 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.0.5.0/24 *[OSPF/150] 00:00:02, metric 12, tag 420
> to 10.0.2.2 via em2.0
According to book metric should be 36 here because of R5 Cost reflect towards ASBR.
So on R1 .redistributed as 10 reaches R3 as 11 and R5 as 12
If you increase your reference bandwidth.. and then use the bandwidth keyword to change the metric calculation..
Like R1-R3 is fast ethernet.. have bandwidth as 100m.. and then R3-R5 is atm.. so have bandwidth of 155m... you will see the difference..
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
edit]
root# run show route 10.0.5.0/24
inet.0: 24 destinations, 24 routes (24 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.0.5.0/24 *[OSPF/150] 04:24:57, metric 12, tag 420
> to 10.0.2.2 via em2.0
again If I check this route on R3 then metric value will be 11 because of single hop.
[edit]
root# run show route 10.0.5.0/24
inet.0: 27 destinations, 27 routes (27 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.0.5.0/24 *[OSPF/150] 04:27:53, metric 11, tag 420
> to 10.0.4.14 via em0.0
So what is your question... I guess I have explained it..
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
can you please guide that, why we use sub interfacing on FE interfaces for routers connectivity.for example interface fe-0/0/1.200
I mean, we can also use fe-0/0/1 (without.200) for connectivity.
This configuration is found on JNCIP Book.
Regards,
Toufiq
Subinterfaces/logical units will be used for many reasons. Mainly they are used to line up logical unit with circuit identifier. Such as in the case of frame relay, DLCI 200 will normally be applied to an interface with the logical unit of 200. With ethernet vlan 200 will line up with logical unit 200, or with ATM VCI 200 will line up with logical unit 200.
This makes for much easier troubleshooting. If you look at fe-0/0/1.200 you know that it is using vlan 200 just from the naming of it.
Granted you could set vlan 200 on logical unit 0 but this would cause troubleshooting issues in the future, the very near future
-Bender
another issue is that I have configured metric type-1 on R1 and requirement is to receive metric 36 on R5 but I am receiving only 12 on R5.
Some one told me that, I need to configure reference-bandwidth on R1 & R2 routers then i will receive required metric on R5.
R1 Config:
=======
policy-options {
policy-statement external {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 10.0.5.0/24 exact;
}
then {
metric 10;
tag 420;
external {
type 1;
Result on R5
=========
edit]
root# run show route 10.0.5.1
inet.0: 22 destinations, 23 routes (22 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.0.5.0/24 *[OSPF/150] 00:00:06, metric 13, tag 420
> to 10.0.2.2 via em2.0
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.