Options

hsrp

arsalan921arsalan921 Member Posts: 56 ■■□□□□□□□□
hello everyone

i would like to ask one question regarding hsrp.
2 routers connected to a switch. they are connected to each other also.
R1's 1 interface to switch, 2nd interface to R2.
R2's 1 interface to switch, 2nd interface to R1.
R1 is primary for vlan 2 and secondary for vlan 3
R2 is primary for vlan 3 and secondary for vlan 2

doing it in gns3.

here is configuration, please see it...

==========================================================

on ROUTER1
hostname R1

vlan database
vlan 2
vlan 3
apply

int fa 1/0 ( connected to switch)
switchport mode trunk

int fa 1/2 ( connected to router )
switchport mode trunk

interface vlan 2
ip address 192.168.2.5 255.255.255.0
standby 1 ip 192.168.2.254
standby 1 priority 200
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 track fast 1/0

interface vlan 3
ip address 192.168.3.6 255.255.255.0
standby 2 ip 192.168.3.254
standby 2 priority 190
standby 2 preempt
standby 2 track fast 1/0


on ROUTER2

hostname R2

vlan database
vlan 2
vlan 3
apply

int fa 1/0 ( connected to switch)
switchport mode trunk

int fa 1/2 ( connected to router)
switchport mode trunk

interface vlan 2
ip address 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.0
standby 1 ip 192.168.2.254
standby 1 priority 190
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 track fast 1/0

interface vlan 3
ip address 192.168.3.5 255.255.255.0
standby 2 ip 192.168.3.254
standby 2 priority 200
standby 2 preempt
standby 2 track fast 1/0

==========================================================
is this configuration right ?

thank you

Comments

  • Options
    stuh84stuh84 Member Posts: 503
    Not quite. The default track value decrement is 10, so even if Fa1/0 goes down on the router, the standby wont take over as active. Configure a bigger decrement, or do the difference between the priorities as less than 10.
    Work In Progress: CCIE R&S Written

    CCIE Progress - Hours reading - 15, hours labbing - 1
  • Options
    arsalan921arsalan921 Member Posts: 56 ■■□□□□□□□□
    thank you for your reply

    i have done the change.

    priority value difference set to 5.

    200 and 195
  • Options
    techEDtechED Member Posts: 55 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Only use the preempt for the primary routers and the secondary routers no preempt (lower priority).


    ROUTER1

    interface vlan 2
    ip address 192.168.2.5 255.255.255.0
    standby 1 ip 192.168.2.254
    standby 1 priority 200
    standby 1 preempt
    standby 1 track fast 1/0

    interface vlan 3
    ip address 192.168.3.6 255.255.255.0
    standby 2 ip 192.168.3.254
    standby 2 priority 190
    standby 2 track fast 1/0


    ROUTER2

    interface vlan 2
    ip address 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.0
    standby 1 ip 192.168.2.254
    standby 1 priority 190
    standby 1 track fast 1/0

    interface vlan 3
    ip address 192.168.3.5 255.255.255.0
    standby 2 ip 192.168.3.254
    standby 2 priority 200
    standby 2 preempt
    standby 2 track fast 1/0
  • Options
    networker050184networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
    techED wrote: »
    Only use the preempt for the primary routers and the secondary routers no preempt (lower priority).


    You still need preempt on the standby so it can take over if the priority falls below on the active in the case of a track lowered priority.
    An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
  • Options
    stuh84stuh84 Member Posts: 503
    I add to it that you should have preempt on both sides, but with the wait/reload timers invoked, that way any traffic isn't going to get blackholed while the network reconverges after a power failure and/or reload on a router. This would stop the reloaded router taking over as primary until a certain amount of time after.
    Work In Progress: CCIE R&S Written

    CCIE Progress - Hours reading - 15, hours labbing - 1
Sign In or Register to comment.