Book now with code EOY2025
eMeS wrote: » I don't like the idea of TPM...
Synthros wrote: » Why don't you like it?
Devilsbane wrote: » I agree with eMeS, 15 just seems too small. I also think you are going to have trouble finding a 15'' screen with 1080P
I don't like the idea of TPM, but hey, to each his own.
Now a days if I had to do it again I would probably just buy a Dell or Apple laptop that has a 17 inch screen,decent battery life and light weight
Several Lenovo Thinkpad models are available with 15.6" 1080p screens. (etc)
tpatt100 wrote: » My Powerbook made it through a tour of Iraq, I went up and down and left and right numerous times. The Air Force crushed it on my plane trip back..... Really now a days I think the RAM is the most important when it comes to doing VMs.
Paul Boz wrote: » Why don't you set up a dedicated server platform to do this for a fraction of the cost and buy a laptop to interface with it remotely?
Why don't you set up a dedicated server platform to do this for a fraction of the cost and buy a laptop to interface with it remotely?
completely agree here. Why not just throw a 6 core amd up 2 1.5 tb disks 16gb ddr3 and place it at home or (home in us). From there install a thin os and install virtualbox with the pHp frontend to access it from the web. You would then be able to provision, snapshot, and build machines on the fly. Using s.s.h/s.c.p/w.g.e.t to add disk images to your system you can set up an amazing set up while modifying and learning from a sub par laptop wherever
All I'm going to say is to remember that, for all it's pomp and grandeur, Mordor ultimately lost, so I'd set my expectations a little higher!
Really now a days I think the RAM is the most important when it comes to doing VMs.
Dell precision m4500 Mobile workstation
eMeS wrote: » I don't like the idea of TPM, but hey, to each his own.
eMeS wrote: » In fact, if I remember correctly there was an allegation that Apple was using this to prevent its OS from running on non-Apple hardware. Not sure if that was ever substantiated or not, but it was alleged.
eMeS wrote: » Also, if I remember correctly TPM has already been overcome.
Sabalo wrote: » I need it to support effortless Bitlocker. I am in what one might consider a hostile environment, so I prefer that my personal data stay personal. Otherwise, I'd not care so much.
tiersten wrote: » You're still going to have to backup your data with an alternative encryption system. Besides, how hostile are we talking about here? Obligatory XKCD comic for this situation.
tiersten wrote: » Obligatory XKCD comic for this situation.
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!