Options

OSPF issue

wera711wera711 Member Posts: 23 ■□□□□□□□□□
I have a lab emulating our actual environment at work. The actual technology is metro Ethernet, but in this lab, each device is interconnected via a regular L2 switch. I am having an issue...

Background:

sl-ce is headquarters.
fa-ce and qs-ce are remote sites
colo-ce is a test site/hot site

The issue:
colo-ce is advertising sl-ce's routes to fa-ce and qs-ce. Thus forcing fa-ce and qs-ce to route through colo-ce, in order to get to sl-ce. I can't figure out why this is happening. I even did a cost of 5 to the colo-ce.

anyone?

Comments

  • Options
    wera711wera711 Member Posts: 23 ■□□□□□□□□□
    from qs-ce:

    qs_ce#sho ip route
    Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
    D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
    N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
    i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
    ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
    o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

    Gateway of last resort is 172.17.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0

    172.17.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
    O 172.17.1.31/32 [110/6] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:45, Ethernet0/0
    C 172.17.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
    O 172.17.1.1/32 [110/6] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:45, Ethernet0/0
    O 172.17.1.101/32 [110/5] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:45, Ethernet0/0
    172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 15 subnets
    O IA 172.16.32.0 [110/71] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:45, Ethernet0/0
    C 172.16.33.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0:1
    C 172.16.34.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1:1
    O IA 172.16.31.0 [110/71] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.16.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.12.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.13.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.14.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.15.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.10.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.11.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.1.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.2.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.3.0 [110/7] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    O IA 172.16.101.0 [110/6] via 172.17.1.101, 00:02:46, Ethernet0/0
    S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.17.1.1
    qs_ce#


    qs_ce#sh ip ospf neig

    Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
    172.17.1.31 1 FULL/ - 00:01:49 172.17.1.31 Ethernet0/0
    172.17.1.1 255 FULL/ - 00:01:36 172.17.1.1 Ethernet0/0
    172.16.101.1 1 FULL/ - 00:01:52 172.17.1.101 Ethernet0/0
    qs_ce#
  • Options
    stuh84stuh84 Member Posts: 503
    From your neighbour relationships, it looks like everything is coming up as point-to-point. Can you do a sh ip ospf interface and a sh ip ospf database on all 4 routers?
    Work In Progress: CCIE R&S Written

    CCIE Progress - Hours reading - 15, hours labbing - 1
  • Options
    deth1kdeth1k Member Posts: 312
    Get rid of neighbor statements and make your central site router DR (if that was your plan) - ip ospf priority 255 and clearing the adjacencies. Also what is the actual metro ethernet physical topology?
Sign In or Register to comment.