what u use at work?
dangtran09
Member Posts: 26 ■□□□□□□□□□
in Off-Topic
please specify what model/version you're using/running at work. just want to have a general idea what's on the market right now.
1. client...ie: xp, mac os x
2. server...redhat 6, win2008 r2
3. mail server...notes 8, exchange 2010
4. mail client..outlook
5. mobile devices...blackberry, pda
6. ticketing system....remedy, landesk
7. hardware firewall....sonicwall, juniper
8. ips
9. ids
10. router
11. switch
12. virtualization
13. web server
14. database server
15. vpn
16. remote tools
17. antivirus
18. network monitoring
and anything else hard/software u want to add.
1. client...ie: xp, mac os x
2. server...redhat 6, win2008 r2
3. mail server...notes 8, exchange 2010
4. mail client..outlook
5. mobile devices...blackberry, pda
6. ticketing system....remedy, landesk
7. hardware firewall....sonicwall, juniper
8. ips
9. ids
10. router
11. switch
12. virtualization
13. web server
14. database server
15. vpn
16. remote tools
17. antivirus
18. network monitoring
and anything else hard/software u want to add.
Comments
-
Hypntick Member Posts: 1,451 ■■■■■■□□□□Nothing to see, don't look at the man behind the curtain....WGU BS:IT Completed June 30th 2012.
WGU MS:ISA Completed October 30th 2013. -
eansdad Member Posts: 775 ■■■■□□□□□□1. Win XP, WIn 7 and several MAC OS
2. Server 2008
3. iMail
4. Outlook and IE for webmail
5. iPod, iPad and some tablets
6. POS that was never designed to be a ticket system
7. Bluecoat
8. Not saying
9. Devinatly not saying
10. Cisco
11. Cisco with a lot of 3COM
12. VMWare
13. Not sure
14. Not sure
15. Does dial up count? Citrix
16. Anything I can get my hands on
17. McAfee -
Ahriakin Member Posts: 1,799 ■■■■■■■■□□Protecting you from yourselves . Guys you should never give out this kind of information over the net, and especially at the request of a complete stranger (who on investigation looks to be using this site for some sort of stat gathering, which even if not malicious is not the desirable on this forum).
PM me if you want your replies removed.We responded to the Year 2000 issue with "Y2K" solutions...isn't this the kind of thinking that got us into trouble in the first place?
This discussion has been closed.