Cisco Macro not executing Interface Range
This one has been getting to me for a few days now.. I'm trying to get some pre-configured macros on all my switches so when I perform an upgrade and I can just kick off these macros..
The goal of this macro:
1. Remove and shutdown vlan 1
2. create VLANs for users
3. Assign the ports to the desired VLANs
Here is a test macro I am working with:
When I run this macro I get the following message:
Now it applies the configuration only to the first port in the interface range... but that's it. From the Cisco document here it says this:
So I assume this can be done... I just can't find much else on this.. I'm running this a Cisco 2960 IOS 12.2(44).. I suppose I can forget about the interface range command and list the individual interfaces but that doesn't seem right...
(I've also tried it without the define interface range and got the same results)
Any thoughts?
The goal of this macro:
1. Remove and shutdown vlan 1
2. create VLANs for users
3. Assign the ports to the desired VLANs
Here is a test macro I am working with:
define interface-range macro1 fa0/1 - 24 define interface-range macro2 gi0/1 - 2 macro name change_network2 interface Vlan1 no ip address shutdown interface vlan 11 description UserNetwork ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 no shutdown interface vlan 99 description Null Interface for unused ports ip address 172.160.1.2 255.255.255.0 no shutdown Interface range macro macro1 switchport mode access switchport access vlan 30 Interface range macro macro2 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan 99 switchport trunk allowed vlan all @
When I run this macro I get the following message:
% Command exited out of interface range and its sub-modes. Not executing the command for second and later interfaces
Now it applies the configuration only to the first port in the interface range... but that's it. From the Cisco document here it says this:
•Applying a macro to an interface range is the same as applying a macro to a single interface. When you use an interface range, the macro is applied sequentially to each interface within the range. If a macro command fails on one interface, it is still applied to the remaining interfaces.
So I assume this can be done... I just can't find much else on this.. I'm running this a Cisco 2960 IOS 12.2(44).. I suppose I can forget about the interface range command and list the individual interfaces but that doesn't seem right...
(I've also tried it without the define interface range and got the same results)
Any thoughts?
My Networking blog
Latest blog post: Let's review EIGRP Named Mode
Currently Studying: CCNP: Wireless - IUWMS
Latest blog post: Let's review EIGRP Named Mode
Currently Studying: CCNP: Wireless - IUWMS
Comments
-
DPG Member Posts: 780 ■■■■■□□□□□Perhaps you can't use shorthand for the define command?
Try this:
define interface-range macro1 fastethernet 0/1 - 24
define interface-range macro2 gigabitethernet 0/1 - 2 -
pitviper Member Posts: 1,376 ■■■■■■■□□□Looks like you can apply a macro within a range command, but can’t use the range command within a macro. I tried your config on a 2960 with the same results. This seems to work though:
macro name switchport switchport mode access switchport access vlan 30 switchport voice vlan 40 mls qos trust cos spanning-tree portfast @ int range f0/1-24 macro apply switchport
CCNP:Collaboration, CCNP:R&S, CCNA:S, CCNA:V, CCNA, CCENT -
SteveO86 Member Posts: 1,423Perhaps you can't use shorthand for the define command?
Try this:
define interface-range macro1 fastethernet 0/1 - 24
define interface-range macro2 gigabitethernet 0/1 - 2
Tried that one already no difference.Looks like you can apply a macro within a range command, but can’t use the range command within a macro. I tried your config on a 2960 with the same results. This seems to work though:macro name switchport switchport mode access switchport access vlan 30 switchport voice vlan 40 mls qos trust cos spanning-tree portfast @ int range f0/1-24 macro apply switchport
Yea, those are the only results I can get working... I wonder why it doesn't work the other way around..
Thanks for the confirmation!My Networking blog
Latest blog post: Let's review EIGRP Named Mode
Currently Studying: CCNP: Wireless - IUWMS