Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
Brownie1985 wrote: » Hi Guys, was hoping someone to help with a quick question Would anyone be able to explain to myself why when using RIP with a no auto-summary a class c networks of say 192.168.0.0, 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0 are just listed as one route of R 192.168.0.0/24 is up, routing via 10.10.10.1, FastEthernet0/0 Just to help explain, say you have three routers (2 interfaces each) plugged into a switch with each interface in the switch given an address of 10.10.0.0/24, then the other interfaces again plugged into its own switch with the interfaces having 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.2.0/24. With this setup the routes do no probigate to the other routes. But if I changes the 192.168.0.0 ranges to class B 172.16.0.0/24, 172.16.1.0/24, 172.16.2.0/24 the routes will propigate. Is this due to the 192.168.0.0 address already being classed as a class C so the route that would be advertised when you enter command network 192.168.0.0 would be [192.168.0].0 with the last ].0 being the variable it would be looking to be different on the subnet? Hope my ramble kinda makes sense for the question I am asking. Thanks
Brownie1985 wrote: » Version 2 is running on all routers with no auto-summary, just checked to make sure. Its odd as this all works fine when using a class b address subnetted to /24 - here is a quick output since changing back to 192.168.0.0 ranges 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 R 10.10.20.0 [120/1] via 10.10.10.3, 00:00:20, FastEthernet0/0 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks R 172.16.0.0/16 is possibly down, routing via 10.10.10.3, FastEthernet0/0 R 172.16.2.0/24 is possibly down, routing via 10.10.10.2, FastEthernet0/0 R 172.16.3.0/24 is possibly down, routing via 10.10.10.3, FastEthernet0/0 C 192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 You can see it was picking up the router correctly when using 172.16.0.0 addresses and all the routers are using network 192.168.0.0. This is only something I have done in GNS, but cant get my head around why using class c address when work
Monkerz wrote: » What network commands are you using under each rip process? "network 172.16.0.0" would advertise 172.16.0.0, 172.16.1.0 and 172.16.2.0, but "network 192.168.0.0" would only advertise 192.168.0.0. I think this is what you were asking in your first post.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.