Although Zynga's decision might be met with some criticism, the firm's executives reportedly justified their strategy by saying it was best for the company. With the unvested shares, the executives believed they could attract more top talent with the promise of stock.
MrRyte wrote: » Attract new employees by screwing over current employees? That's an interesting HR tactic. Let us know how it all works out.....
tpatt100 wrote: » I like how they "evaluated" who should give the stock back. Better not say "you are all valuable employees" at the next Christmas party.
deth1k wrote: » CWU anyone? Sure enough that's not legal towards your employees i'd see what CWU representative has to say about it. Not sure if it exists in US though:Welcome to the CWU - Communication Workers Union
shodown wrote: » And if you were operating in a good market someone would be right in behind you to suck your business up and hire your good emplooyes. The reality is that UNIONS are good and bad. A long time ago when there wasn't rights for workers they were needed. In the modern world they have to change there roles, some workers are dirt bags and need to be let go, you don't need to be paid over market value to do basic work. But the way the company in particular is acting is a great example of why unions are good. While I've never had to use a union in the jobs I've had, some people who were untreated fairly would have had a way for there issues to be resolved without them turning ugly. Don't think they are all bad find out what they are about then judge from that. I will agree that they overstep there boundaries, but there were needed.
powerfool wrote: » I don' think I could disagree more, honestly. Unions are a bygone necessity. When there was no other recourse and people were essentially being treated slightly better than slaves, sure. However, there is plenty of recourse today and it has nothing to do with rights... there are no such thing as worker rights, regardless of who wants to pretend they exist or whether laws suggest that they exist. There are only natural rights which everyone is entitled... no one can grant or abdicate rights; they are fundamental and inherit, whether we are aware of the or not. Today, however, people are more educated than ever and plenty of means for these educated people to take action exist, including access to legal counsel, the ear of a well-educated friend, and regardless of the economy access to other work. Sure it may take some time to find another job, but the prospects are still out there. And none of that has to do with unions... unions take advantage of their workers just the same as employers do... and they only ever "protect" employees so long as it keep unions relevant. Further, too many people today have enough self-respect to not want to be involved with a union. Granted, a lot of what I said is opinion... but plenty of it is factual, and my opinions are based on facts and principles. I will NEVER work in a union. I have put for the effort to get me where I am... I am not lashing myself together with others for collective bargaining... I prefer individual bargaining because I am worth something. Folks to develop some self-esteem and confidence... which likely has skills and intellect as a prerequisite. [/rant] Apologies to the innocent.
shodown wrote: » We both agree that unions are a thing of the past, but we disagree on the fact that I think they should modernize and you think a person can stand on his own two feet and take a corp to war. I can live with that. Now what about you closing your doors, would you really attempt it if you owned a company?