subnet question -- does not compute!?
mguy
Member Posts: 167 ■■■□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
192.168.100.66 /27
Find Valid Subnet, Broadcast, Valid hosts
/27 = 32 (block Size)
{0, 32, 64, 96... }
everyone ok so far?
A: (This is from lammle book which I believe has an error)
Valid Subnet: 192.168.100.32 (!!)
Broadcast address: 192.168.100.63 (!!)
Valid hosts: 192.168.100.33-63 (!!)
---
What's going on?
Find Valid Subnet, Broadcast, Valid hosts
/27 = 32 (block Size)
{0, 32, 64, 96... }
everyone ok so far?
A: (This is from lammle book which I believe has an error)
Valid Subnet: 192.168.100.32 (!!)
Broadcast address: 192.168.100.63 (!!)
Valid hosts: 192.168.100.33-63 (!!)
---
What's going on?
Comments
-
MrBrian Member Posts: 520Well if that's what it says, then yea it's a mistake. With a /27 it's a block size of 32 like you said.
192.168.100.66/27 it would be:
subnet= 192.168.100.64
broadcast addr= 192.168.100.95
valid hosts= 192.168.100.65-94Currently reading: Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi -
martell1000 Member Posts: 389maybe its a typo and he meant 192.168.100.36 /27 which would match the answersAnd then, I started a blog ...
-
veritas_libertas Member Posts: 5,746 ■■■■■■■■■■Yeah, unless I'm missing something it's completely wrong. Have you looked up the errata for your book?
-
Ltat42a Member Posts: 587 ■■■□□□□□□□Here's his 7th edition errata page -
Wiley: CCNA Cisco Certified Network Associate Study Guide: Exam 640-802, includes CD-ROM, 7th Edition -
MrBrian Member Posts: 520Even if it was meant to be the 32 subnet, the valid hosts is still wrong..
It would be 192.168.100.33-62.. not 192.168.100.33-63 (63 is the broadcast addr for the subnet)Currently reading: Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi