vsecgod wrote: » nah it's ez pie. I'd just take it today if I had the option.
vsecgod wrote: » lol I was just tr-o-ll - ing. hahaha. There's a reason that there are threads in this forum about people failing and saying "OMG HARDEST EXAM EVARRR", but then again, since you claim you have never failed a technical exam yet and I see you've passed GSEC (which is pretty hard as well), I'd say you may be one of those people with an IQ over 150 or something and is above most of the regular joe blokes like me that you see floating around on these forums. Let us know if your confidence pays off if you take it soon, then you can prove your a "special" guy haha. Edit: the tr-o-l-l word got blocked...wonder why.
vsecgod wrote: » No problem. Here is the thread where I posted questions about the SSCP questions from StudISCope: http://www.techexams.net/forums/isc-sscp-cissp/76985-studiscope-feedback-sscp-particular.html I can tell you that with those, I got a 60% vs test questions from a another source, which I got a 87%. So with that, you can see the StudISCope is much harder. I am planning on taking the CISSP so let me know if the same can be said of the CISSP test questions from StudISCope.
reppgoa wrote: » I mean, I get that its an advanced test, but I took a practice test using the labsim software. Same amount of questions, same time limit and I got a 96% and finished far before the time limit. I get that practice tests are different, but it cant be THAT different. I will admit that I am a test taker by nature, I have yet to fail a single cert exam and generally get higher than 85%. I am currently waiting for the CBT version to hit the US and plan to take my CISSP then. So let me know, is it really that hard or are some people just not test takers?
symc wrote: » Yes, its living hell! I would defo hold off until CBT's come in, the 6 week wait is worse than the exam