Security Controls for Router Console Access
teancum144
Member Posts: 229 ■■■□□□□□□□
in Network+
Which of the following security controls are MOST effective when a router only supports local configuration changes via serial console? (Select TWO).
A. Biometric door locks
B. Two-factor authentication
C. IP cameras
D. Strong passwords
E. One-time passwords
The answer is A and C. I understand A. However, wouldn't D be better than C. Wouldn't you want router access via the a serial console cable to be password protected. Or, is there no way to password protect a router's console port? (I don't have a lot of background with enterprise-level routers)
A. Biometric door locks
B. Two-factor authentication
C. IP cameras
D. Strong passwords
E. One-time passwords
The answer is A and C. I understand A. However, wouldn't D be better than C. Wouldn't you want router access via the a serial console cable to be password protected. Or, is there no way to password protect a router's console port? (I don't have a lot of background with enterprise-level routers)
If you like my comments or questions, you can show appreciation by clicking on the reputation badge/star icon near the lower left of my post.
Comments
-
paulgswanson Member Posts: 311IP Cameras would be a physical security measure where as strong passwords would be a software security measure.
I think they way they worded it was odd. From what I see, I belive the keyword in the question would be local (Implies physical access)
Passwords them selves are always present so long as its set (so i think that ones a given). I personally never set a port password nor do I know if thats even an option.
Also this would be 2 factor Identify verification. A) Biometric - something you are and Photo verification
Personally I'd have gotten this one wrong just cause of the wording.http://paulswansonblog.wordpress.com/
WGU Progress: B.S. Network Management & Design <- I quit (got bored)