VLSM on Class B
mguy
Member Posts: 167 ■■■□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
I can do VLSM on Class C, but Class B got me :
Say you need
Network 1: 200 users
Network 2: 14 users
Network 3: 2 users
Given: 172.16.0.0 /23
I would think I'd give Network 1
172.16.0.0 /23
Range[172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255]
So network 2 (14 users) has to start with
172.16.0.0/28
So network 3 (2 users) will be
172.16.4.0/30
Help! Ionno how..
Say you need
Network 1: 200 users
Network 2: 14 users
Network 3: 2 users
Given: 172.16.0.0 /23
I would think I'd give Network 1
172.16.0.0 /23
Range[172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255]
So network 2 (14 users) has to start with
172.16.0.0/28
So network 3 (2 users) will be
172.16.4.0/30
Help! Ionno how..
Comments
-
mguy Member Posts: 167 ■■■□□□□□□□Now that I think about it. We are assigned 172.16.0.0/23 which means we have Range[172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255]
N1: 172.16.0.0 /24
N2:172.16.1.0/28
N3:172.16.1.16/30
correct? -
elderkai Member Posts: 279You can't have your networks overlap, though. You say the range for N1 is 172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255, but then you have N2 start at 172.16.1.0 which belongs to N1's range. You'd have to start N2 at 172.16.4.0/28.
-
mguy Member Posts: 167 ■■■□□□□□□□Now that I think about it. We are assigned 172.16.0.0/23 which means we have Range[172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255]
N1: 172.16.0.0 /24
N2:172.16.1.0/28
N3:172.16.1.16/30
correct?
is there overlap in this? -
oli356 Member Posts: 364Yes, because if network 1 is 172.16.0.0 - 172.16.3.255 and network 2 starts at 172.16.1.0, well it can't start at 1, has to start at 172.16.4.0 like elderkai said.
I'm good at subnetting, hopeless at VLSM, need to do some studyingLab:
Combination of GNS3 and Cisco equipment if required. -
elderkai Member Posts: 279Yeah, that's what I said in my post. You just need to change the third ocet to start at 4 for N2. It takes some practice and getting used to, but I'm sure you'll get the hang of it. You pretty much have it.
-
xbuzz Member Posts: 122You're right in your second post, if I understand the question correctly mguy.
You have the 172.16.0.0/23 subnet at your disposal. That subnet isn't used at all, which is where the other posters are getting confused I think. The question requires that you split that subnet into further small subnets to satisfy the criteria of 200 users in 1 subnet, 14 in the next, and 4 users in the final subnet, in which case you're right that:
N1: 172.16.0.0 /24
N2:172.16.1.0/28
N3:172.16.1.16/30
...is the answer.
EDIT: You are however wrong in thinking that the network 172.16.0.0/23 gives you the range 172.16.0.0 -> 172.16.3.255. It actually gives you the range 172.16.0.0 -> 172.16.1.255, but that doesn't effect the answer to the question in this case. -
mguy Member Posts: 167 ■■■□□□□□□□You're right in your second post, if I understand the question correctly mguy.
You have the 172.16.0.0/23 subnet at your disposal. That subnet isn't used at all, which is where the other posters are getting confused I think. The question requires that you split that subnet into further small subnets to satisfy the criteria of 200 users in 1 subnet, 14 in the next, and 4 users in the final subnet, in which case you're right that:
N1: 172.16.0.0 /24
N2:172.16.1.0/28
N3:172.16.1.16/30
...is the answer.
EDIT: You are however wrong in thinking that the network 172.16.0.0/23 gives you the range 172.16.0.0 -> 172.16.3.255. It actually gives you the range 172.16.0.0 -> 172.16.1.255, but that doesn't effect the answer to the question in this case.
Yup that range is correct. VLSM is starting to lock in to place.
I'm using www.subnetskills.com