Akaricloud wrote: » We've looked at Cisco ISE and in all honestly it looks great but our company size/budget has held us back from moving forward with it. I honestly think with the whole BYOD movement they are going to be quite popular here in the near future and experts will be in demand.
swild wrote: » The price is pretty steep. After all is said and done it looks like a $50k minimum investment for 100 end hosts. High end of $2 mill with 100000 end hosts.
networkjutsu wrote: » So now, I am just trying to implement Win2K8's NPS/NAP for 802.1x and still keep the tac_plus. If only I know more about MS stuff then it should be up and running by now. I couldn't get it to work in my lab but I think I made some progress on it since Windows 7 was asking for credentials but kept saying wrong credentials. The first one I did in my lab never did ask for credentials! Maybe my third one will be a success. Cross fingers. Maybe some TE guys can help with my NPS/NAP lab? Would really appreciate it!
swild wrote: » Yeah, I don't have to move. The price is pretty steep. After all is said and done it looks like a $50k minimum investment for 100 end hosts. High end of $2 mill with 100000 end hosts.
Zartanasaurus wrote: » Me and you are doing the exact same thing right now! I have it working in my test environment with a WLC4400, AP1252 and Windows NPS.
networkjutsu wrote: » Mine is for Wired 802.1x. What is your lab setup? One box doing AD, CA, and NPS/NAP? I tried doing separate boxes on all three and didn't get any luck on two tries. My next attempt would be two boxes, one AD and one CA + NPS/NAP. I may need your help if I still couldn't get it to work.
Zartanasaurus wrote: » I have a separate AD, NPS and CA server. Do you know exactly where you got stuck? Did you register the NPS server with AD and configure the CA to automatically issue certs to IAS servers? I used this guide from Microsoft to handle the NPS requirements. Do some Wireshark captures on the NPS and filter for RADIUS to see where the process is breaking.