Portchannel Query.
Hi All
Does any one have any experience of combining layer 2 and 3 port-channels?
example, port-channel set to layer 3 with IP address and interfaces in the channel set to layer 2 and trunked?
This was put forward as an idea at my work by a CCNP, i am not convinced this will work and cannot find any information/documentation to support it. I don't want to dismiss this but cannot understand the theory behind it.
Any one heard of this? or done this before
Cheers
Does any one have any experience of combining layer 2 and 3 port-channels?
example, port-channel set to layer 3 with IP address and interfaces in the channel set to layer 2 and trunked?
This was put forward as an idea at my work by a CCNP, i am not convinced this will work and cannot find any information/documentation to support it. I don't want to dismiss this but cannot understand the theory behind it.
Any one heard of this? or done this before
Cheers
Comments
-
networker050184
Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
Are you talking about doing 802.1q sub interfaces on the port-channel interface? That works, but you can't do L2 trunks and an L3 port-channel interface. There would be no point in doing this anyway.An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made. -
astorrs
Member Posts: 3,139 ■■■■■■□□□□
I don't think you can mix and match L2/L3 - at least you didn't used to be able to.
Why not just do l2 port-channel and use an interface vlan, or subinterfaces on an l3 port-channel. Why do you want to combine them (i.e., what are you trying to accomplish)? -
cb3dwa
Member Posts: 80 ■■□□□□□□□□
Interesting, its not sub interfaces.
He deffo said you could do no switchport on port-channel and switchport on interface.
Be worth asking him to lab it up
-
networker050184
Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
What would be the point of doing that anyway? It wouldn't accomplish anything.....An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
-
CodeBlue1914
Member Posts: 19 ■■□□□□□□□□
If I am understanding your question...we have a similar setup in my office with our border routers and border switches. Our border routers have a port-channel with several sub interfaces. We have two 3750s stacked so one cable goes to the top and other goes to the bottom and these are also set as a port-channel. The port-channel on the router, like i said, has some sub-interfaces while the port-channel on the switches are set as a layer 2 trunk.
Hope this helps -
cb3dwa
Member Posts: 80 ■■□□□□□□□□
networker050184 wrote: »What would be the point of doing that anyway? It wouldn't accomplish anything.....
god knows i didn't understand it either. -
BeTheNetwork
Member Posts: 18 ■□□□□□□□□□
It doesn't matter what your order-of-operations is, if you built L2 physical interfaces into the PO first, the PO will not allow you to add an IP. And, vice-versa, if you provisioned a L3 PO and tried to add the l2 physical interfaces, the channel-group command would be rejected. When you provision interfaces on a Cisco IOS device, the device will have a finite number of hardware IDB's and software IDB's (Interface Descriptor Blocks). If you provisioned L2 interfaces, then the IDB allocation would be N+1 for HWIDBs and N for SWIDB (N = Channels/VLANs). For routed interfaces, the IDB allocation is 1 HWIDB and 1 SWIDB. A L3 PO can't be setup for 1 HWIDB and 1 SWIDB when the physical interfaces are set with SW N and HW N+1.
IDB Documentation
