Options

configuring static ip's?

Node ManNode Man Member Posts: 668 ■■■□□□□□□□
Hi Everyone,
First let me thank everyone for all the good advice that i have already received on T.E. You guys are a big help.

Ok, now for my question:

For configuring a static ip route, an "IP route" command can either direct to a subnet thru the routers interface **OR** direct to an ip at another routers interface ?

Examples:
ip router 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 s0/0/0

or
ip route 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 172.10.10.10
?

Do i have this right?

I will rephrase : Is there more than one way to configure a static route?

Thanks again for everything.

Comments

  • Options
    jdancerjdancer Member Posts: 482 ■■■■□□□□□□
    At the CCNA level, Cisco wants you to know how to configure static routes TWO ways:

    1) ip route A.B.C.D subnet-mask next-hop-address
    2) ip route A.B.C.D subnet-mask exit-interface

    You'll probably want to know the difference between the two. I'll leave it up to you to research it. icon_cool.gif
  • Options
    ZartanasaurusZartanasaurus Member Posts: 2,008 ■■■■■■■■■□
    Like jdancer said, yes there is more than one way to do it. Just to give you a hint on his clues, there are very specific reasons NOT to configure a static route to an interface.
    Currently reading:
    IPSec VPN Design 44%
    Mastering VMWare vSphere 5​ 42.8%
  • Options
    Node ManNode Man Member Posts: 668 ■■■□□□□□□□
    Thanks both of you icon_smile.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.