configuring static ip's?
Node Man
Member Posts: 668 ■■■□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
Hi Everyone,
First let me thank everyone for all the good advice that i have already received on T.E. You guys are a big help.
Ok, now for my question:
For configuring a static ip route, an "IP route" command can either direct to a subnet thru the routers interface **OR** direct to an ip at another routers interface ?
Examples:
ip router 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 s0/0/0
or
ip route 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 172.10.10.10
?
Do i have this right?
I will rephrase : Is there more than one way to configure a static route?
Thanks again for everything.
First let me thank everyone for all the good advice that i have already received on T.E. You guys are a big help.
Ok, now for my question:
For configuring a static ip route, an "IP route" command can either direct to a subnet thru the routers interface **OR** direct to an ip at another routers interface ?
Examples:
ip router 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 s0/0/0
or
ip route 120.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 172.10.10.10
?
Do i have this right?
I will rephrase : Is there more than one way to configure a static route?
Thanks again for everything.
Comments
-
jdancer Member Posts: 482 ■■■■□□□□□□At the CCNA level, Cisco wants you to know how to configure static routes TWO ways:
1) ip route A.B.C.D subnet-mask next-hop-address
2) ip route A.B.C.D subnet-mask exit-interface
You'll probably want to know the difference between the two. I'll leave it up to you to research it. -
Zartanasaurus Member Posts: 2,008 ■■■■■■■■■□Like jdancer said, yes there is more than one way to do it. Just to give you a hint on his clues, there are very specific reasons NOT to configure a static route to an interface.Currently reading:
IPSec VPN Design 44%
Mastering VMWare vSphere 5 42.8%