State of Ubuntu
the_Grinch
Member Posts: 4,165 ■■■■■■■■■■
in Off-Topic
A few years back when discussing Ubuntu, it was referred to as baby Linux. No one was actually using their server edition in production (so the conversation went) and real admins were using X (be it Redhat, SuSE, Solaris, etc). Fast forward to today, what do you think the current buzz is with Ubuntu? Is it still baby Linux?
WIP:
PHP
Kotlin
Intro to Discrete Math
Programming Languages
Work stuff
PHP
Kotlin
Intro to Discrete Math
Programming Languages
Work stuff
Comments
-
WafflesAndRootbeer Member Posts: 555Ubuntu is the most popular and used distro out there according to the stats. It's designed to be user-friendly and is particularly geared towards those who are not technical-minded. As for their server distro, I don't know of anyone who uses it for professional purposes but I would imagine that it is used outside of the US. I myself use Ubuntu, so I'm fine with it.
-
networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 ModIt's definitely one of the more user friendly, ready on install distros. If that's what you mean by 'baby Linux' then it hasn't changed.
I have never seen an Ubuntu server used for anything customer facing though a few people have under the desk boxes for scripts, shell access, etc.An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made. -
YuckTheFankees Member Posts: 1,281 ■■■■■□□□□□Ubuntu is the most popular distro for personal use, but I have not seen it in a business environment. Out of the three I.T. companies I have worked with, they all used CentOS or Red Hat.
-
ptilsen Member Posts: 2,835 ■■■■■■■■■■I've seen a Ubuntu server. It was setup by a developer to host some minor tool. I have never seen an IT department running Ubuntu for production servers. I, too, have seen mostly RedHat and CentOS. By comparison, the only time I've ever heard of a non-techie using Linux is Ubuntu.
I don't think much has changed for Ubuntu in the last few years. -
the_Grinch Member Posts: 4,165 ■■■■■■■■■■Yeah that's what I kind of figured. I guess I keep seeing them making strides and some companies talking about it, but wanted to see what the boots on the ground see. Thanks all!WIP:
PHP
Kotlin
Intro to Discrete Math
Programming Languages
Work stuff -
Kinet1c Member Posts: 604 ■■■■□□□□□□I was a fan of Ubuntu desktop up until probably 10.04 and after that felt it had gotten too heavy. I use Lubuntu every once in a while as I have it installed on my USB keys and also my old eeepc 1000.2018 Goals - Learn all the Hashicorp products
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity -
MentholMoose Member Posts: 1,525 ■■■■■■■■□□I think RHEL is more common at companies in the US, but Ubuntu is definitely in use. For a regular enterprise using off the shelf software, RHEL might be the only option since some vendors will support RHEL and not Ubuntu. But for deployments running custom (in house) applications, there is not much difference. The developers may use Ubuntu on their desktop and prefer to build their application for Ubuntu servers. I've seen a gaming company with thousands of Ubuntu VMs running custom game servers.MentholMoose
MCSA 2003, LFCS, LFCE (expired), VCP6-DCV -
log32 Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 217I have been using Ubuntu server for fog project (imaging system - works amazing) since it did not work right for RHEL6, but our linux environment consists of RHEL only.
Ubuntu is definitely a friendly one for new users and IMO could switch windows if they both had the same support for office files (openoffice/libre does not work well enough to satisfy me anyway) -
ccnxjr Member Posts: 304 ■■■□□□□□□□MentholMoose wrote: »...For a regular enterprise using off the shelf software, RHEL might be the only option since some vendors will support RHEL and not Ubuntu. But for deployments running custom (in house) applications, there is not much difference. ...
-
UnixGuy Mod Posts: 4,570 ModI've seen Ubuntu used as a Server and jobs asking for experience with Ubuntu.