RIPv1 doesn't supprot subnetting?
workfrom925
Member Posts: 196
in CCNA & CCENT
Is it correct that RIPv1 does not do subnetting? The smallest network utilizing RIPv1 would require a class C ＩＰ domain, right?
I get this idea because it says the network command would assume the subnet mask by checking the netowork IP entered. And the smallest network IP that we can enter is a class C IP address.
I get this idea because it says the network command would assume the subnet mask by checking the netowork IP entered. And the smallest network IP that we can enter is a class C IP address.
Comments
-
networker050184
Mod Posts: 11,962 Mod
RIPv1 does not communicate subnet mask in the routing updates.An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made. -
NetworkVeteran
Member Posts: 2,338 ■■■■■■■■□□
workfrom925 wrote: »Is it correct that RIPv1 does not do subnetting? The smallest network utilizing RIPv1 would require a class C ＩＰ domain, right?
As Networker said, the actual limitation is RIPv1 doesn't communicate subnet masks in routing updates.
If you lab it up, the nuances of that statement may become clear.