EIGRP Feasible Successor Question

BlueUmbrellaBlueUmbrella Registered Users Posts: 2 ■□□□□□□□□□
Hi. I'm hoping someone is able to answer a question for me. I have read that to qualify as a feasible successor, a router must have an AD less than the FD of the current successor and that this is to help avoid loops. Can anyone please explain why this has to be so and how this avoids creating a loop?

Any help would be much appreciated, thanks! :)

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.