fredrikjj wrote: » I actually asked someone (a senior person who makes hiring decisions) at a Cisco partner over here this exact question and he recommended that I did CCNP R&S before I did any additional CCNAs, and that is without me having any actual "CCNP level" real life experience. Another anecdote in favor of the "no experience CCNP" is that on an episode of PacketPushers Greg Ferro said that if he had to choose between a CCNP without experience who could talk intelligently about those topics, and a CCNA with two years of experience, he would lean towards the CCNP. And then you have people on the other end of the spectrum who will disagree with this and argue that a cert without the equivalent experience is more or less useless and that they will always favor experience over certification. Having studied CCNP Route for six weeks now, it's not hard to construct a scenario where the CCNA+experience guy might be useless, but the CCNP guy won't be. You just need to introduce some BGP.
networker050184 wrote: » That is assuming of course the CCNA with experience did not learn anything on the job outside of the CCNA objectives in those two years which is highly unlikely in my experience. Just because a person only has a CCNA doesn't mean they are not an expert with a protocol like BGP.