CarlSaiyed wrote: » If thin and light is important, hold out for the retina macbook pro!
stryder144 wrote: » The MBP has a more gamer friendly nVidia graphics chip and better built-in graphics (Iris Pro).
CarlSaiyed wrote: » Apple also just announced that OS upgrades will be free from now on...
Mutata wrote: » I will be using the laptop mostly for running VMs , surfing the web, light coding/scripting and surfing the web. Gaming would be a nice to have, but my desktop is more than sufficient to fill that role.
ptilsen wrote: » The PCI-E thing is a valid difference, though I would want to see benchmarks in Boot Camp or at least same-app benchmarks in Mac OS X to see the actual performance difference. The CPU, however, is a non-issue, IMO. You'll find very few real-world laptop needs for even a Core i7 over an i5. I actually wish I'd gotten an i5 in my Ivy Bridge laptop. The i7 makes it hotter and sucks up power for what is usually an imperceptible speed difference (mind you, I thought I'd be doing more virtualization than I am when I bought it). Another minor benefit, from my research, is that the MBP can output to three 1080P monitors comfortably or two plus the built-in. I don't think the Dell can output to three, period, but it might be able to do two and itself. This might sound like a silly difference, but to me it's the difference between actually replacing my desktop (I use three 1080p monitors when programming, and not even a 3200x1800 monitor will entice me away from my setup). But really, I think someone would be crazy not to wait for reviews and benchmarks. The cheapest of the Dell 15s is a ton of money for a computer that if you think about it is really only a marginal improvement over a last-gen or two-gens-old model at twice the price. Better be sure about your decision before blowing a grand or three.