Network ranges - are my calculations correct?
binaryhat
Member Posts: 129
in CCNA & CCENT
Class B = 255.255.0.0
170.50.0.0
1000 networks
A) 1000 networks in binary
10 bits
Increment
11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000
64 is increment
255.255.255.192 = /26
C) Network ranges
170.50.0.0 – 170.50.63.255
170.50.64.0 – 170.50.127255
170.50.128.0 – 170.50.191.255
170.50.192.0 – 170.50.255.255
170.50.1.0 - – 170.50.1.63
170.50.1.64 – 170.50.1.127
170.50.1.128 – 170.50.1.191
170.50.1.192 – 170.50.1.255
...
..
Are my network ranges correct?
170.50.0.0
1000 networks
A) 1000 networks in binary
10 bits
Increment11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000
64 is increment
255.255.255.192 = /26
C) Network ranges
170.50.0.0 – 170.50.63.255
170.50.64.0 – 170.50.127255
170.50.128.0 – 170.50.191.255
170.50.192.0 – 170.50.255.255
170.50.1.0 - – 170.50.1.63
170.50.1.64 – 170.50.1.127
170.50.1.128 – 170.50.1.191
170.50.1.192 – 170.50.1.255
...
..
Are my network ranges correct?
Currently working on:
ICND1 - TBD
Book: CCENT/CCNA ICND1 100-101 Official Cert Guide
Equipment: Packet Tracer, GNS3
Supplement Material: Youtube, Google, Boson ExamSim-Max, CBTNuggets
ICND1 - TBD
Book: CCENT/CCNA ICND1 100-101 Official Cert Guide
Equipment: Packet Tracer, GNS3
Supplement Material: Youtube, Google, Boson ExamSim-Max, CBTNuggets
Comments
-
late_collision
Member Posts: 146
If I understand your question correctly
These are incorrect. You have the right idea, but these are 18 bit networks.170.50.0.0 – 170.50.63.255
170.50.64.0 – 170.50.127255
170.50.128.0 – 170.50.191.255
170.50.192.0 – 170.50.255.255
These look correct:170.50.1.0 - – 170.50.1.63
170.50.1.64 – 170.50.1.127
170.50.1.128 – 170.50.1.191
170.50.1.192 – 170.50.1.255 -
HAMP
Member Posts: 163
If I understand the question:
170.50.0.0
170.50.0.1 – 170.50.0.63
170.50.0.64---- 170.50.0.65 – 170.50.0.127
170.50.0.128--- 170.50.0.129 – 170.50.0.191
170.50.0.192--- 170.50.0.193 – 170.50.0.255
170.50.1.0
170.50.1.1 – 170.50.1.63
170.50.1.64
170.50.1.65 – 170.50.1.127
170.50.1.128
170.50.1.129 – 170.50.1.191
170.50.1.192
170.50.1.193 – 170.50.1.255
170.50.2.0
170.50.2.1 – 170.50.2.63
170.50.2.64
170.50.2.65 – 170.50.2.127
170.50.2.128
170.50.2.129 – 170.50.2.191
170.50.2.192
170.50.2.193 – 170.50.2.255
The last column being broadcast, and not host
-
binaryhat
Member Posts: 129
If I understand the question:
170.50.0.0
170.50.0.1 – 170.50.0.63
170.50.0.64---- 170.50.0.65 – 170.50.0.127
170.50.0.128--- 170.50.0.129 – 170.50.0.191
170.50.0.192--- 170.50.0.193 – 170.50.0.255
170.50.1.0
170.50.1.1 – 170.50.1.63
170.50.1.64
170.50.1.65 – 170.50.1.127
170.50.1.128
170.50.1.129 – 170.50.1.191
170.50.1.192
170.50.1.193 – 170.50.1.255
170.50.2.0
170.50.2.1 – 170.50.2.63
170.50.2.64
170.50.2.65 – 170.50.2.127
170.50.2.128
170.50.2.129 – 170.50.2.191
170.50.2.192
170.50.2.193 – 170.50.2.255
The last column being broadcast, and not host
I think these are incorrect. Not sure.
Can someone else chime in...?Currently working on:
ICND1 - TBD
Book: CCENT/CCNA ICND1 100-101 Official Cert Guide
Equipment: Packet Tracer, GNS3
Supplement Material: Youtube, Google, Boson ExamSim-Max, CBTNuggets -
Dieg0M
Member Posts: 861
Those are correct for /26 networksFollow my CCDE journey at www.routingnull0.com -
OfWolfAndMan
Member Posts: 923 ■■■■□□□□□□
I think these are incorrect. Not sure.
Can someone else chime in...?
Those are right. If you want ranges from your example in C to work, you need a 255.255.192.0 mask.:study:Reading: Lab Books, Ansible Documentation, Python Cookbook 2018 Goals: More Ansible/Python work for Automation, IPSpace Automation Course [X], Build Jenkins Framework for Network Automation [] -
binaryhat
Member Posts: 129
I see it now...thanks!Currently working on:
ICND1 - TBD
Book: CCENT/CCNA ICND1 100-101 Official Cert Guide
Equipment: Packet Tracer, GNS3
Supplement Material: Youtube, Google, Boson ExamSim-Max, CBTNuggets
