Premium courses and e-learning should be FREE

I've always thought of it as a very stupid thing to purposefully block people from information that will enable them to be a better resource, person, professional, etc.
TL;DR:
This is true for things like closed-off library/journal databases, course-ware sites like Udemy and LinkedinLearning, etc.
(ISC)2 keeps listing numbers in their magazines about how companies keep falling prey to cyber attacks and about how so much of the workforce is lacking in infosec knowledge and or stature (there's probably a conflict of interest there but let's not visit that).
I shouldn't have to pay (ISC)2 to learn about CCSP concepts, I shouldn't have to pay Cisco or Juniper to learn IOS or JunOS, I shouldn't have to pay courseware "instructors" for learning things like Linux, programming, etc. These things and "products" should be readily available to the public where even top quality platforms and solutions should be FREE.
EDIT:
This is not to argue that there aren't free solutions everywhere. Anyone with an internet connection and access to the majority of the web can see practically anything. The problem with this is that speed-reading through random information alone does nothing for anyone. That's why FB has seen such a fiasco that it has. There needs to be format that can be used, much like e-learning and e-courses. This is also not to suggest that free options available now are lackluster, but rather that the ones that are PREMIUM and therefore NOT FREE should be in fact FREE if they have been created with the intent to actually pass on knowledge to people. Nobody should have to pay to have knowledge transferred. Nobody asked people to create top-notch course-ware on Udemy. They did so on their own volition. Why then charge people for this work? You could benefit so many people by just making it readily available from the internet WITHOUT a paywall. Yet, all these organizations and countries wonder why on earth they can't obtain people with valid credentials, knowledge, experience, etc. Maybe if companies like CompTIA and ISC2 stopped putting a paywall on their magazines, club-only resources, and CBKs, maybe people wouldn't be so out of the loop.
Comments
"I don't work for free, just like food isn't put on my table for free, and how a roof is not guaranteed to me." - anyone
People need to earn a living, it comes in many forms and that includes selling information on how to secure information systems. It seems like you don't really have a problem with people earning a living but you do have a problem with people earning a living off of securing information systems.
2023 Cert Goals: SC-100, eCPTX
No one is purposely blocking you or anyone else from learning the material. They are purposely trying to profit from what they have to offer. If you don't want to pay (ISC)2, Cisco, or Juniper then don't.
ICP-FDO ▪ CISSP ▪ ECES ▪ CHFI ▪ CNDA ▪ CEH ▪ MCSA/MCITP ▪ MCTS ▪ S+
2020 Level Up Goals: (1) DevSecOps Learning Path (2) OSCP
it is the mindset.
I give you some examples:
A small Op team were complaining that they have so much work and need a new Op in their team (100% Linux)...in the interview I asked some questions like:
- Do you maintain a documentation system like confluence and do you maintain a detailed logical network plan ?
ANSWER: We have shared folder with text files
MyNoteInMyHead: FAIL
So long those people don't change their mindset, nothing will change. In Germany we had some scandalous news the last weeks...along a well known car rental company had its customer DB public...without further protection --> MEGA FAIL
This means, a certification (even for free) would not prevent this...rather a huge butt kick COULD !
Most stuff is free, no one forces you to visit a live course. Books, Videos etc. must cost money --> production. And the exams ...well I've no problem with that. Critical is the hardware you mostly need to build labs.
INE, Udemy etc. are worth the money most times.
some other certs...
The information is out there for free. If someone else compiles it and prepares it to teach it to you, they want to be compensated for that time and effort.
Let us know when you spend thousands of hours writing books or doing courses and then are asked to not be paid for doing that work. The concept that they did a course without being asked, so they shouldn't be paid, is silly. In that case we'd never get any future development on almost anything, because few people would be creating anything new, because no one would already be demanding it.
Also, the idea that if all learning material was free that suddenly people would just read it all and all security issues would go out the window is so far from reality. For example, I manage a security team, I provide a lot of information to my team, most of them don't look at most of it. I've gotten demos of expensive learning platforms and said, "hey guys we need to check this out, please demo some courses, virtual labs, etc, and let me know what you think" Weeks later, I had looked at far more than anyone else and they all just didn't get around it, not because they were too busy, but because there is so much free information out there it's like overload that when given yet a new premium source it wasn't even all that exciting. I've come home from a few SANS courses like.. wow that was amazing! Anyone want to hear about.. oh, nothing? OK then, carry on.
One of the platforms forgot to even turn off the demo, I went back months later and logged in, surprised, still no one had bothered using it. And these are actual security engineers, not random people on the web who would suddenly get access to a higher quality video course.
Security Engineer/Analyst/Geek, Red & Blue Teams
OSCP, GCFA, GWAPT, CISSP, OSWP, AWS SA-A, AWS Security, Sec+, Linux+, CCNA Cyber Ops, CCSK
2021 goals: maybe AWAE or SLAE, bunch o' courses and red team labs?
some other certs...
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
Blog: www.network-node.com
If you don't feel you should pay for it, go read the manuals and free content out there in protest. If someone works hard to produce paid content, you're not obligated to it for free.
Blog: www.network-node.com
ICP-FDO ▪ CISSP ▪ ECES ▪ CHFI ▪ CNDA ▪ CEH ▪ MCSA/MCITP ▪ MCTS ▪ S+
2020 Level Up Goals: (1) DevSecOps Learning Path (2) OSCP
The only certs I've had work cover have been SANS, and I've done them via work study. Work wouldn't even pay for the certs themselves but I trade off the extra work of the program so I can bundle in the exam cost and, tada, now I'm trading effort for qualifications that I otherwise couldn't get approved.
While we're working in a capitalist system, people need money to live. So certification vendors need to make money, as do training centers, and book authors.
However, I'd like to see more free base or entry level certs and courses. Then get the eventual employer or the now employed person to pay for higher ones. LPIC did this at one stage for LPIC 101, I think you still need to pay for the cert but it is cheap and they used to give some away in the developing world and to unemployed. But how good would it be for Security+ or CEH to be free. Heck EC-council could make the CEH version minus 1 free, and allow people to at least say they are certified for 12 months. Then they need to pay to be certified longer or something.
My work cover all security certifications for myself and my staff. As it should be. They aren't covering my Uni degree, but I'm getting that on near interest free loan from the Government here in Australia.
"Brain does not meet certification requirements, please install more certifications" Me
Currently Studying: Cyber Security masters and ISC2 CCSP.
Security blog; http://security.morganstorey.com
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray