Nervous and Hyperventilating

in SSCP
I am going to take the exam very, very soon. I am extremely nervous. I hate to say that I couldn't remember many things. Fire suppression of Class A? B? C? D? IEEE version for what? Orange book at which level? Level A???? I mean I am screwed.
I did the practice tests in CCCure and took less than 2 hours to finish each test of 250 questions. Scored over 75%. No, I didn't earn over 80%, a threshold that could almost guarantee a pass. I was damn bored taking the tests.
I don't know what else to do. I just bought the scenario-based questions. I am going through them right now.
And worst, I am partially inebriated.
A totally irrelevant question: is this the way to establish merit/assurance/reliability for the InfoSec field? To drive us crazy and make us nervous??? Or to put it another way: is putting a huge hurdle that will inadvertently (or maybe intentionally) inflict pain, fear, and suffering on candidates the most viable way to establish respectable standard in information security field? Are we trying to emulate the medical field or what? Are we trying to say that, "Look! Doctors don't have it easy and neither do we!"
Why the test? Isn't security about blocking access to unauthorized subjects (trying to speak the language here), about being skeptical to prevent social engineering, about controls to make sure things fall in lines, and about whacking individuals who have the guts to refuse compliance? I smell nihilism and at least pseudo nihilism. Given nihilism, why this test? That's illogical, you think? Are we denying logic but at the same time enforcing logic in controlled environment for, uh, organizational security and human safety? In short, for money and the so-called humanity dressed up by the greedy corporations.
Or maybe, I am too old for this. Maybe, I am little drunk while answering questions in CCCure right now.



:
:
:

I did the practice tests in CCCure and took less than 2 hours to finish each test of 250 questions. Scored over 75%. No, I didn't earn over 80%, a threshold that could almost guarantee a pass. I was damn bored taking the tests.
I don't know what else to do. I just bought the scenario-based questions. I am going through them right now.
And worst, I am partially inebriated.
A totally irrelevant question: is this the way to establish merit/assurance/reliability for the InfoSec field? To drive us crazy and make us nervous??? Or to put it another way: is putting a huge hurdle that will inadvertently (or maybe intentionally) inflict pain, fear, and suffering on candidates the most viable way to establish respectable standard in information security field? Are we trying to emulate the medical field or what? Are we trying to say that, "Look! Doctors don't have it easy and neither do we!"
Why the test? Isn't security about blocking access to unauthorized subjects (trying to speak the language here), about being skeptical to prevent social engineering, about controls to make sure things fall in lines, and about whacking individuals who have the guts to refuse compliance? I smell nihilism and at least pseudo nihilism. Given nihilism, why this test? That's illogical, you think? Are we denying logic but at the same time enforcing logic in controlled environment for, uh, organizational security and human safety? In short, for money and the so-called humanity dressed up by the greedy corporations.
Or maybe, I am too old for this. Maybe, I am little drunk while answering questions in CCCure right now.









Comments
You seem to have some misconceptions. NOTHING guarantees you will pass. Experience, study aids, etc do play a role in enhancing the probability of passing, but nothing guarantees it. What other books or CBTs have you used to study? Also, what is your Infosec experience?
I know there is no guarantee of passing (or anything in life as a matter of fact). I am just extremely nervous but I will "try" to calm down. You may wonder how can someone working in this field not be able to stay cool under pressure. Well, I wonder that myself too.
I have more or less 10 years experience in the field. What books do I use? Shon Harris and Sybex 6th. Mainly Sybex 6th because Shon Harris's book put me to sleep. I did the 250-questions of Shon Harris though. In all seriousness, CCCure questions do not seem to resemble the real exam questions but at least they compensate for a lack of in-depth study for certain parts of the domains. They tell you what you have missed reading. So, in that sense, they help. Still, there are way too technical and some of the questions threw me out of a loop. I was confident with my answers given my experience but the right answers told otherwise.
I think the first thing I need to do is to calm myself down.
This is so true! Well, less than 24 hours to take the exam. There is nothing I can do. I don't feel prepared and I am not going to lie. I can only pray.
Some tips:
For fire classes, remember "CLEM K"
A Common Combustibles
B Liquid
C Electrical
D Metal
K Kitchen
For integrity and confidentiality models, remember that all integrity models contain the letter "i" and none of the confidentiality models do. This does not apply to the types of models, such as lattice, information flow, etc.
I could go on and on....just relax and watch some TV the day before the exam. I would not recommend do any more reading/studying past 8/9PM that day.
Forum Admin at www.techexams.net
--
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdmurray
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdmurray
Currently Working On: Python, OSCP Prep
Next Up: OSCP
Studying: Code Academy (Python), Bash Scripting, Virtual Hacking Lab Coursework
That is the problem. Plus, I skipped many details when studying.
I am starting to like this exam!!!