Screwed after giving notice

2»

Comments

  • RHDS2KRHDS2K Member Posts: 41 ■■□□□□□□□□
    I appreciate everyone's input.. I guess I just have the personality where i don't like being screwed over. This wasn't my boss' idea, this was the new VP who has only been here for about 2 months. He determined my raise (if you can even call it that) after i finish my degree this month.. I told my boss i wasn't happy with the raise and they don't even pay me enough to make ends meet here. After the VP heard about my resignation he said to let me go tomorrow since it's the end of the pay period. I'm mostly frustrated because this was just a slap in the face from the VP. He doesn't NEED to let me go. It has nothing to do with security or access, because i'm still here right now. This was just a power play to screw me for leaving. I told them i was leaving due to financial constraints then they take a week of pay from me. It's the personal blow that frustrates me the most. I've done A LOT of good work here that was well beyond my role as a "Jr systems admin". I've seen plenty of other people here put in their notice and ride out the entire couple weeks. I almost feel like this was more of a personal attack for telling them their pay sucks (in nicer words).
  • RHDS2KRHDS2K Member Posts: 41 ■■□□□□□□□□
    With that being said, you can bet your asses i'll be buying myself some corona and enjoying the next 2 weeks finishing up college and working on my play cars icon_thumright.gif
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 2,091 ■■■■■■■■■■
    RHDS2K wrote: »
    This was just a power play to screw me for leaving.

    No. It IS to make the life of payroll folks easier. Next time you quit a job, schedule it to be at the end of a pay period.
    2018 Certification Goals: Maybe VMware Sales Cert
    "Simplify, then add lightness" -Colin Chapman
  • aspiringsoulaspiringsoul Member Posts: 314
    I would not let that bother you. I worked for a bank previously. It was funny how when I gave my two weeks notice, I was suddenly worth about $12,000 more to them...to do the same things I had been doing.

    If you are leaving your employer to work for a competitor, then most of the time, they will walk you straight out the door. It's a pretty standard practice. If you're not leaving for a competitor, the some employers will let you work your two weeks. Don't take it personal.

    My employer really needed me when I gave my notice, and they allowed me to tie up a few loose ends before I left.
    Education: MS-Information Security and Assurance from Western Governors University, BS-Business Information Systems from Indiana Wesleyan University, AAS-Computer Network Systems - ITT Tech,
  • HeeroHeero Member Posts: 486
    If they asked, I would say no assuming I needed the money. If I didn't need the money, I'd **** off right away and enjoy my week off.

    If they fire you, file unemployment for the week :)
  • ITHokieITHokie Member Posts: 158 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Wow, there are a lot of comments claiming that "it's just business" to let employees go right after they give notice. I can see that in some cases (security), but in many that would clearly be anti-business. When employees are not able to transition any responsibilities for projects they were working on (or leading) or they are unable to facilitate soft transition of customers, business hurts. I don't think it's always a rational business decision to immediately cut ties.

    On the other hand, if this is becoming standard practice (without compensation), employees will stop giving advanced notice. I think that works in the employees' favor. Employers aren't expected to give employees 2 weeks notice for layoffs, terminations or RIFs. Current protocol favors one side over the other.
Sign In or Register to comment.