Security+ ROI
According to Cramsession's website, Security+ has a ROI (still unclear as to what this stands for) of 8.8, while MCSA has an ROI of 6.3....Does this by any way mean that Security+ is "valued" more than MCSA? This is very hard for me to believe, after passing the exam.
Working on MS-ISA at Western Governor's University
Comments
-
BubbaJ Member Posts: 323Vask3n wrote:According to Cramsession's website, Security+ has a ROI (still unclear as to what this stands for) of 8.8, while MCSA has an ROI of 6.3....Does this by any way mean that Security+ is "valued" more than MCSA? This is very hard for me to believe, after passing the exam.
ROI is Return On Investment. This comparison can be misleading if the disparity in the investment is large. 6.3x100 is much larger than 8.8x10. -
Webmaster Admin Posts: 10,292 AdminAlthough the Security+ exam 'costs' more than an MS exam, you need to invest in four exam for MCSA. As BubbaJ mentioned, comparing them can be misleading.
MCSA is certainly more 'valued' by employers than Security+. MCSA itself can lead to a job while with just Security+ that will be tough. -
supertechCETma Member Posts: 377BubbaJ wrote:Vask3n wrote:According to Cramsession's website, Security+ has a ROI (still unclear as to what this stands for) of 8.8, while MCSA has an ROI of 6.3....Does this by any way mean that Security+ is "valued" more than MCSA? This is very hard for me to believe, after passing the exam.
ROI is Return On Investment. This comparison can be misleading if the disparity in the investment is large. 6.3x100 is much larger than 8.8x10.
on a scale of 1 to 10, 8.8 is considered a better "value" than 6.3, as if to say you would get a return of $8.80 for every $10 you spend.Electronic Technicians Association-International www.eta-i.org
The Fiber Optic Association www.thefoa.org
Home Acoustics Alliance® http://www.homeacoustics.net/
Imaging Science Foundation http://www.imagingscience.com/ -
Vask3n Member Posts: 517In terms of ROI, is the "Return" simply in terms of money, or as in "return" in terms of satisfaction?Working on MS-ISA at Western Governor's University
-
BubbaJ Member Posts: 323supertechCETma wrote:huh?
on a scale of 1 to 10, 8.8 is considered a better "value" than 6.3, as if to say you would get a return of $8.80 for every $10 you spend.
My point is: if you have to invest (money for study material, study time, exam costs) a lot less money for the 8.8 vs. the 6.3, the absolute return on the 6.3 can be much higher than the 8.8.
The only way to do a direct comparison is if the investment is in the same ballpark for both. I would rather invest $100 at 6.3 than $10 at 8.8.